These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25048478)

  • 1. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.
    Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT
    Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perioperative Outcomes of 3-Arm Versus 4-Arm Robotic Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
    Yim GW; Eoh KJ; Chung YS; Kim SW; Kim S; Nam EJ; Lee JY; Kim YT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):823-831. PubMed ID: 29287717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Luo C; Liu M; Li X
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
    Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
    Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Nezhat FR; Datta MS; Liu C; Chuang L; Zakashansky K
    JSLS; 2008; 12(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 18765043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Between the Initial Learning Period of Robotic and the Experienced Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Chong GO; Lee YH; Lee HJ; Hong DG; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Feb; 28(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29303929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
    Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
    Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A single-center study.
    Oyama K; Kanno K; Kojima R; Shirane A; Yanai S; Ota Y; Andou M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):405-411. PubMed ID: 30426602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A case-control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.
    Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim S; Kim JH; Jung YW; Paek JH; Lee SH; Kim JW; Kim YT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1284-9. PubMed ID: 21289494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of outcomes of laparotomic and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Chang SH; Huang KG; Yang LY; Pan YB; Lai CH; Chou HH
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Sep; 35(5):e60. PubMed ID: 38425140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
    Zhang SS; Ding T; Cui ZH; Lv Y; Jiang RA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(4):e14171. PubMed ID: 30681582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
    Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
    Soliman PT; Frumovitz M; Sun CC; Dos Reis R; Schmeler KM; Nick AM; Westin SN; Brown J; Levenback CF; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Nov; 123(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 21872911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy vs. Robotic assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Marchand G; Taher Masoud A; Abdelsattar A; King A; Brazil G; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Baruelo G; Govindan M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Oct; 289():190-202. PubMed ID: 37690282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.