132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25049219)
1. Comparison of volumetric breast density estimations from mammography and thorax CT.
Geeraert N; Klausz R; Cockmartin L; Muller S; Bosmans H; Bloch I
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4391-409. PubMed ID: 25049219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Calibration of Full-Field Digital Mammography: Feasibility on Japanese Women With and Without Breast Cancer.
Wang J; Kato F; Yamashita H; Baba M; Cui Y; Li R; Oyama-Manabe N; Shirato H
J Digit Imaging; 2017 Apr; 30(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 27832519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative analysis for breast density estimation in low dose chest CT scans.
Moon WK; Lo CM; Goo JM; Bae MS; Chang JM; Huang CS; Chen JH; Ivanova V; Chang RF
J Med Syst; 2014 Mar; 38(3):21. PubMed ID: 24643751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast density quantification in dual-energy mammography using virtual anthropomorphic phantoms.
Pacheco G; Castillo-Lopez JP; Villaseñor-Navarro Y; Brandan ME
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 May; 25(5):e14360. PubMed ID: 38648734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammography.
Molloi S; Ducote JL; Ding H; Feig SA
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081917. PubMed ID: 25086548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms.
Alonzo-Proulx O; Packard N; Boone JM; Al-Mayah A; Brock KK; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):3027-44. PubMed ID: 20463377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative volumetric breast density estimation using phase contrast mammography.
Wang Z; Hauser N; Kubik-Huch RA; D'Isidoro F; Stampanoni M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 May; 60(10):4123-35. PubMed ID: 25933258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a phantom to test fully automated breast density software - A work in progress.
Waade GG; Hofvind S; Thompson JD; Highnam R; Hogg P
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb; 23(1):e14-e19. PubMed ID: 28290354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast density: comparison of chest CT with mammography.
Salvatore M; Margolies L; Kale M; Wisnivesky J; Kotkin S; Henschke CI; Yankelevitz DF
Radiology; 2014 Jan; 270(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 24126363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment.
Brand JS; Czene K; Shepherd JA; Leifland K; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Eriksson M; Li J; Humphreys K; Hall P
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1764-72. PubMed ID: 25012995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Density Analysis Using an Automatic Density Segmentation Algorithm.
Oliver A; Tortajada M; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Vilagran M; Sentís M; Martí R
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 25720749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital versus screen-film mammography: impact of mammographic density and hormone therapy on breast cancer detection.
Chiarelli AM; Prummel MV; Muradali D; Shumak RS; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Done SJ; Yaffe MJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Nov; 154(2):377-87. PubMed ID: 26518019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts.
Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How does semi-automated computer-derived CT measure of breast density compare with subjective assessments to assess mean glandular breast density, in patients with breast cancer?
Bansal GJ; Kotugodella S
Br J Radiol; 2014 Dec; 87(1044):20140530. PubMed ID: 25373436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of automated volumetric breast density assessment in short-term digital mammography reimaging.
Ko ES; Kim RB; Han BK
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(4):582-6. PubMed ID: 25754139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density.
Holm J; Humphreys K; Li J; Ploner A; Cheddad A; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Czene K
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(9):1030-7. PubMed ID: 25646195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
