BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25049378)

  • 1. Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation.
    Heath GA; O'Donoughue P; Arent DJ; Bazilian M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Aug; 111(31):E3167-76. PubMed ID: 25049378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation.
    Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Sep; 41(17):6290-6. PubMed ID: 17937317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of Generation Efficiencies and Supply Chain Leaks for the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity in the United States.
    Tavakkoli S; Feng L; Miller SM; Jordaan SM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 56(4):2540-2550. PubMed ID: 35107984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling the relative GHG emissions of conventional and shale gas production.
    Stephenson T; Valle JE; Riera-Palou X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10757-64. PubMed ID: 22085088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implications of shale gas development for climate change.
    Newell RG; Raimi D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(15):8360-8. PubMed ID: 24754840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption of Marcellus shale gas.
    Laurenzi IJ; Jersey GR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 May; 47(9):4896-903. PubMed ID: 23548112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can Switching from Coal to Shale Gas Bring Net Carbon Reductions to China?
    Qin Y; Edwards R; Tong F; Mauzerall DL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 51(5):2554-2562. PubMed ID: 28178420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum.
    Burnham A; Han J; Clark CE; Wang M; Dunn JB; Palou-Rivera I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):619-27. PubMed ID: 22107036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. liquefied natural gas exports: implications for end uses.
    Abrahams LS; Samaras C; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3237-45. PubMed ID: 25650513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
    Bohnengel B; PatiƱo-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of life cycle greenhouse gases from natural gas pathways for medium and heavy-duty vehicles.
    Tong F; Jaramillo P; Azevedo IM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(12):7123-33. PubMed ID: 25938939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emissions implications of future natural gas production and use in the U.S. and in the Rocky Mountain region.
    McLeod JD; Brinkman GL; Milford JB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(22):13036-44. PubMed ID: 25329514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Techno-Economic Assessment and Life Cycle Assessment of CO
    Abuov Y; Serik G; Lee W
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jun; 56(12):8571-8580. PubMed ID: 35653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy.
    Samaras C; Meisterling K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(9):3170-6. PubMed ID: 18522090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for climate and air quality damages in future U.S. electricity generation scenarios.
    Brown KE; Henze DK; Milford JB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Apr; 47(7):3065-72. PubMed ID: 23465362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Country-Level Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Liquefied Natural Gas Trade for Electricity Generation.
    Kasumu AS; Li V; Coleman JW; Liendo J; Jordaan SM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 52(4):1735-1746. PubMed ID: 29328654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unconventional Heavy Oil Growth and Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
    Nduagu EI; Gates ID
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(14):8824-32. PubMed ID: 26114481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from United States natural gas end-uses and its effects on policy.
    Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(19):8182-9. PubMed ID: 21846117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural gas fugitive emissions rates constrained by global atmospheric methane and ethane.
    Schwietzke S; Griffin WM; Matthews HS; Bruhwiler LM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7714-22. PubMed ID: 24945600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.