These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2505029)

  • 21. Choosing a therapy electron accelerator target.
    Hutcheon RM; Schriber SO; Funk LW; Sherman NK
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 112371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Buildup/surface dose and exit dose measurements for a 6-MV linear accelerator.
    Purdy JA
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 3084928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Backscattered dose perturbation effects at metallic interfaces irradiated by high-energy X- and gamma-ray therapeutic beams.
    Ravikumar M; Ravichandran R; Sathiyan S; Supe SS
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Mar; 180(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 14991206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characteristics of electron beams from a medical microtron.
    George RE; Frost SV; Hartson-Eaton M
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 3090411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A study of effective attenuation coefficient for calculating tissue compensator thickness.
    Bagne FR; Samsami N; Hoke SW; Bronn DG
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 2106610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attenuation of 4-20 MV x rays by a new compensator material of cement.
    Thomsen MS; Ulsø N
    Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2427-32. PubMed ID: 12408317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for a high-energy photon beam.
    Ding GX
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2459-63. PubMed ID: 12462709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Field homogeneity of bevelled intraoperative electron beam cones: the influence of virtual focus surface distance.
    Olsen DR; Paulsen TH; Heyerdal H; Tveit KM; Wiig JN; Giercksky KE; Storaas A
    Med Dosim; 1995; 20(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 7632342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of air cavities on the dose distribution of high-energy electron beams.
    Nüsslin F
    Phys Med Biol; 1975 Sep; 20(3):728-34. PubMed ID: 810817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of initial electron beam parameters on Monte Carlo calculated absorbed dose distributions for radiotherapy photon beams.
    Tzedakis A; Damilakis JE; Mazonakis M; Stratakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):907-13. PubMed ID: 15125009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modeling transmission and scatter for photon beam attenuators.
    Ahnesjö A; Weber L; Nilsson P
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1711-20. PubMed ID: 8587523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Determination of virtual SSDs for electron beams from a dual energy linear accelerator.
    Sharma AK; Supe SS; Narayanan VK; Subbarangaiah K
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1992 Jul; 168(7):402-5. PubMed ID: 1496450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of various atomic number absorbers on skin dose for 10-MeV x rays.
    Khan FM; Moore VC; Levitt SH
    Radiology; 1973 Oct; 109(1):209-12. PubMed ID: 4205838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Monte Carlo simulation of backscatter from lead for clinical electron beams using EGSnrc.
    Chow JC; Grigorov GN
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1241-50. PubMed ID: 18491516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement of dose in the buildup region using fixed-separation plane-parallel ionization chambers.
    Gerbi BJ; Khan FM
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 2106611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dose distribution considerations of medium energy electron beams at extended source-to-surface distance.
    Saw CB; Ayyangar KM; Pawlicki T; Korb LJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Apr; 32(1):159-64. PubMed ID: 7721612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Angular distributions of absorbed dose of Bremsstrahlung and secondary electrons induced by 18-, 28- and 38-MeV electron beams in thick targets.
    Takada M; Kosako K; Oishi K; Nakamura T; Sato K; Kamiyama T; Kiyanagi Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Mar; 153(3):369-83. PubMed ID: 22761326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrons as the cause of the observed dmax shift with field size in high energy photon beams.
    Biggs PJ; Ling CC
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 113656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Dose distributions of fast electrons with an energy of 7-24 Mev in electromagnetic beam formation].
    Shambulov RS; Khvan GV; Saĭbekov TS; Azhigaliev NA; Shuinbekov AD
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1983 Mar; 28(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 6403798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparisons of electron beam dose measurements in water and polystyrene using various dosimeters.
    Kase KR; Adler GJ; Bjärngard BE
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6804767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.