These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25051387)
1. "Magnitude-based inference": a statistical review. Welsh AH; Knight EJ Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Apr; 47(4):874-84. PubMed ID: 25051387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnitude-based inference: progressive approach or flawed statistic? Young AJ Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Apr; 47(4):873. PubMed ID: 25783665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Distinguishing between statistical significance and practical/clinical meaningfulness using statistical inference. Wilkinson M Sports Med; 2014 Mar; 44(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 24248505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The case for magnitude-based inference. Batterham AM; Hopkins WG Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Apr; 47(4):885. PubMed ID: 25783666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian lesion-deficit inference with Bayes factor mapping: Key advantages, limitations, and a toolbox. Sperber C; Gallucci L; Smaczny S; Umarova R Neuroimage; 2023 May; 271():120008. PubMed ID: 36914109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Problem with "Magnitude-based Inference". Sainani KL Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Oct; 50(10):2166-2176. PubMed ID: 29683920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inference about magnitudes of effects. Barker RJ; Schofield MR Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2008 Dec; 3(4):547-57. PubMed ID: 19223677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods. Hopkins WG; Batterham AM Sports Med; 2016 Oct; 46(10):1563-73. PubMed ID: 26971328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Test by Any Other Name: P Values, Bayes Factors, and Statistical Inference. Stern HS Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 26881954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Living with p values: resurrecting a Bayesian perspective on frequentist statistics. Greenland S; Poole C Epidemiology; 2013 Jan; 24(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23232611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses in cluster-randomized trials. Moerbeek M Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):126-137. PubMed ID: 30350025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpreting the results of clinical trials, embracing uncertainty: A Bayesian approach. Frost SA; Alexandrou E; Schulz L; Aneman A Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2021 Feb; 65(2):146-150. PubMed ID: 33051864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical Bayesian Inference in Neuroscience: Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Embrace the Distribution. Coventry BS; Bartlett EL eNeuro; 2024 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 38918054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic review of the use of "magnitude-based inference" in sports science and medicine. Lohse KR; Sainani KL; Taylor JA; Butson ML; Knight EJ; Vickers AJ PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0235318. PubMed ID: 32589653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. To P or Not to P: Backing Bayesian Statistics. Buchinsky FJ; Chadha NK Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Dec; 157(6):915-918. PubMed ID: 29192853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The contrast and convergence of Bayesian and frequentist statistical approaches in pharmacoeconomic analysis. Skrepnek GH Pharmacoeconomics; 2007; 25(8):649-64. PubMed ID: 17640107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequentist, Bayesian Analysis and Complementary Statistical Tools for Geriatric and Rehabilitation Fields: Are Traditional Null-Hypothesis Significance Testing Methods Sufficient? Nascimento DDC; Rolnick N; da Silva Almeida I; Cipriano Junior G; Durigan JL Clin Interv Aging; 2024; 19():277-287. PubMed ID: 38380229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]