111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25051900)
1. Low torque levels can initiate a removal of the passivation layer and cause fretting in modular hip stems.
Jauch SY; Coles LG; Ng LV; Miles AW; Gill HS
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Sep; 36(9):1140-6. PubMed ID: 25051900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of impact assembly on the interface deformation and fretting corrosion of modular hip tapers: An in vitro study.
Panagiotidou A; Cobb T; Meswania J; Skinner J; Hart A; Haddad F; Blunn G
J Orthop Res; 2018 Jan; 36(1):405-416. PubMed ID: 28485507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of frictional torque and bending moment on corrosion at the taper interface : an in vitro study.
Panagiotidou A; Meswania J; Osman K; Bolland B; Latham J; Skinner J; Haddad FS; Hart A; Blunn G
Bone Joint J; 2015 Apr; 97-B(4):463-72. PubMed ID: 25820883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of impact assembly on the fretting corrosion of modular hip tapers.
Mroczkowski ML; Hertzler JS; Humphrey SM; Johnson T; Blanchard CR
J Orthop Res; 2006 Feb; 24(2):271-9. PubMed ID: 16435360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in the fretting corrosion of metal-metal and ceramic-metal modular junctions of total hip replacements.
Hallab NJ; Messina C; Skipor A; Jacobs JJ
J Orthop Res; 2004 Mar; 22(2):250-9. PubMed ID: 15013082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An analysis of the head-neck taper interface in retrieved hip prostheses.
Lieberman JR; Rimnac CM; Garvin KL; Klein RW; Salvati EA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Mar; (300):162-7. PubMed ID: 8131330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assembly force and taper angle difference influence the relative motion at the stem-neck interface of bi-modular hip prostheses.
Haschke H; Jauch-Matt SY; Sellenschloh K; Huber G; Morlock MM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jul; 230(7):690-9. PubMed ID: 27170535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of trunnion roughness and length on the modular taper junction strength under typical intraoperative assembly forces.
Jauch-Matt SY; Miles AW; Gill HS
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Jan; 39():94-101. PubMed ID: 27913177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrieval analysis and in vitro assessment of strength, durability, and distraction of a modular total hip replacement.
Nganbe M; Louati H; Khan U; Speirs A; Beaulé PE
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Dec; 95(3):819-27. PubMed ID: 20737432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of material coupling and assembly condition on the magnitude of micromotion at the stem-neck interface of a modular hip endoprosthesis.
Jauch SY; Huber G; Hoenig E; Baxmann M; Grupp TM; Morlock MM
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1747-51. PubMed ID: 21531416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of Seating Load Magnitude on Incremental Cyclic Fretting Corrosion in 5°40' Mixed Alloy Modular Taper Junctions.
Pierre D; Swaminathan V; Scholl LY; TenHuisen K; Gilbert JL
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1953-1961. PubMed ID: 29486910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of head size on corrosion and fretting behaviour at the head-neck interface of artificial hip joints.
Dyrkacz RM; Brandt JM; Ojo OA; Turgeon TR; Wyss UP
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jun; 28(6):1036-40. PubMed ID: 23528551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of the Contact Area at the Head-Stem Taper Interface of Modular Hip Prostheses.
Witt F; Gührs J; Morlock MM; Bishop NE
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135517. PubMed ID: 26280914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of the support systems' compliance on total hip modular taper seating stability.
Scholl L; Pierre D; Rajaravivarma R; Lee R; Faizan A; Swaminathan V; TenHuisen K; Gilbert JL; Nevelos J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Sep; 232(9):862-870. PubMed ID: 30238861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of contact conditions and micromotions on the fretting behavior of modular titanium alloy taper connections.
Baxmann M; Jauch SY; Schilling C; Blömer W; Grupp TM; Morlock MM
Med Eng Phys; 2013 May; 35(5):676-83; discussion 676. PubMed ID: 22940445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Micromotions at the taper interface between stem and neck adapter of a bimodular hip prosthesis during activities of daily living.
Jauch SY; Huber G; Sellenschloh K; Haschke H; Baxmann M; Grupp TM; Morlock MM
J Orthop Res; 2013 Aug; 31(8):1165-71. PubMed ID: 23553890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impaction Force Influences Taper-Trunnion Stability in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Danoff JR; Longaray J; Rajaravivarma R; Gopalakrishnan A; Chen AF; Hozack WJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7S):S270-S274. PubMed ID: 29428467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of hip implant modular neck material and assembly method on fatigue life and distraction force.
Aljenaei F; Catelas I; Louati H; Beaulé PE; Nganbe M
J Orthop Res; 2017 Sep; 35(9):2023-2030. PubMed ID: 27862223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the compliance of a patient's body on the head taper fixation strength of modular hip implants.
Krull A; Bishop NE; Steffen NM; Lampe F; Püschel K; Morlock MM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Jul; 46():1-5. PubMed ID: 28463695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro simulation of fretting-corrosion in hip implant modular junctions: The influence of pH.
Royhman D; Patel M; Jacobs JJ; Wimmer MA; Hallab NJ; Mathew MT
Med Eng Phys; 2018 Feb; 52():1-9. PubMed ID: 29290499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
