These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25052146)
1. Comparative evaluation of canal isthmus debridement efficacy of modified EndoVac technique with different irrigation systems. Thomas AR; Velmurugan N; Smita S; Jothilatha S J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1676-80. PubMed ID: 25052146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study. Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Armellin E; Conte G; Cianconi L J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1456-60. PubMed ID: 24139274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of debris removal with three different irrigation techniques. Howard RK; Kirkpatrick TC; Rutledge RE; Yaccino JM J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1301-5. PubMed ID: 21846554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supplementary Steps for Removing Hard Tissue Debris from Isthmus-containing Canal Systems. Keleş A; Alçin H; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA J Endod; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1677-1682. PubMed ID: 27623498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the EndoVac system and conventional needle irrigation on removal of the smear layer in primary molar root canals. Buldur B; Kapdan A Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1168-1174. PubMed ID: 29072242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro comparisons of debris removal of the EndoActivator system, the F file, ultrasonic irrigation, and NaOCl irrigation alone after hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. Klyn SL; Kirkpatrick TC; Rutledge RE J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1367-71. PubMed ID: 20647098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars. Munoz HR; Camacho-Cuadra K J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):445-8. PubMed ID: 22414827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study. Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Alvarez Serrano S; Hernandez SR J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1279-82. PubMed ID: 21846548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of different final irrigation methods on the removal of calcium hydroxide from an artificial standardized groove in the apical third of root canals. Capar ID; Ozcan E; Arslan H; Ertas H; Aydinbelge HA J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):451-4. PubMed ID: 24565670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of sealer penetration using the EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle root canal irrigation. Kara Tuncer A; Unal B J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 24767552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Canal and isthmus debridement efficacy using a sonic irrigation technique in a closed-canal system. Johnson M; Sidow SJ; Looney SW; Lindsey K; Niu LN; Tay FR J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1265-8. PubMed ID: 22892748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris. Curtis TO; Sedgley CM J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1261-4. PubMed ID: 22892747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of volume of endodontic irrigants used in different irrigation techniques on root canal dentin microhardness. Arul B; Suresh N; Sivarajan R; Natanasabapathy V Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34810395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of different irrigant activation techniques for cleaning root canal anastomosis. Montaser OK; Fayyad DM; Abdelsalam N BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):142. PubMed ID: 36906530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of final irrigant protocols for debris removal from simulated canal irregularities. Martins Justo A; Abreu da Rosa R; Santini MF; Cardoso Ferreira MB; Pereira JR; Húngaro Duarte MA; Reis Só MV J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2009-14. PubMed ID: 25266470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Debris Removal from the Mesial Root Canal System of Mandibular Molars with Laser-activated Irrigation. Passalidou S; Calberson F; De Bruyne M; De Moor R; Meire MA J Endod; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1697-1701. PubMed ID: 30241679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]