983 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25052213)
1. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.
Chalfin HJ; Dinizo M; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Humphreys E; Han M
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1684-9. PubMed ID: 22788795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural History of Clinical Recurrence Patterns of Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
Moschini M; Sharma V; Zattoni F; Quevedo JF; Davis BJ; Kwon E; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):135-42. PubMed ID: 25865061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinicopathological predictors of systemic progression and prostate cancer mortality in patients with a positive surgical margin at radical prostatectomy.
Boorjian SA; Tollefson MK; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2012 Mar; 15(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 21808286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tissue-based Genomics Augments Post-prostatectomy Risk Stratification in a Natural History Cohort of Intermediate- and High-Risk Men.
Ross AE; Johnson MH; Yousefi K; Davicioni E; Netto GJ; Marchionni L; Fedor HL; Glavaris S; Choeurng V; Buerki C; Erho N; Lam LL; Humphreys EB; Faraj S; Bezerra SM; Han M; Partin AW; Trock BJ; Schaeffer EM
Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 26058959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A genomic classifier improves prediction of metastatic disease within 5 years after surgery in node-negative high-risk prostate cancer patients managed by radical prostatectomy without adjuvant therapy.
Klein EA; Yousefi K; Haddad Z; Choeurng V; Buerki C; Stephenson AJ; Li J; Kattan MW; Magi-Galluzzi C; Davicioni E
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):778-86. PubMed ID: 25466945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.
Diaz M; Peabody JO; Kapoor V; Sammon J; Rogers CG; Stricker H; Lane Z; Gupta N; Bhandari M; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1168-1176. PubMed ID: 24996687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
