These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25052373)

  • 1. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ehsani S; Nebbe B; Normando D; Lagravere MO; Flores-Mir C
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 25052373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample.
    Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):597-609. PubMed ID: 10587592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II and division I malocclusion: a cephalometric study in 12 patients].
    Luo Y; Fang G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Feb; 14(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 15747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the twin block appliance in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients. A systematic review.
    Flores-Mir C; Major PW
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):876-81. PubMed ID: 17029526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the effects of monoblock and twin-block appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
    Tümer N; Gültan AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):460-8. PubMed ID: 10511676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues.
    Illing HM; Morris DO; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):501-16. PubMed ID: 9825553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of the Twin-block appliance treatment on the skeletal and dentolaveolar changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Sidlauskas A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2005; 41(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 15947523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric appraisal of Class II treatment effects after functional and fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Zelderloo A; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Verdonck A; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):334-341. PubMed ID: 27742730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Efficacy evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance and tooth extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    Gong Y; Yu Q; Li PL; Wang HH; Wei B; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Oct; 23(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 25543606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skeletal and dental changes in Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with splint-type Herbst appliances. A systematic review.
    Flores-Mir C; Ayeh A; Goswani A; Charkhandeh S
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Mar; 77(2):376-81. PubMed ID: 17319777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.