456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25052374)
1. Time relevance, citation of reporting guidelines, and breadth of literature search in systematic reviews in orthodontics.
Livas C; Pandis N; Ren Y
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 25052374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Authorship characteristics of orthodontic randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses in non-orthodontic journals with impact factor.
Alqaydi AR; Kanavakis G; Naser-Ud-Din S; Athanasiou AE
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Sep; 40(5):480-487. PubMed ID: 29228139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.
Sampson M; Shojania KG; Garritty C; Horsley T; Ocampo M; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Epidemiology of systematic reviews in imaging journals: evaluation of publication trends and sustainability?
Alabousi M; Alabousi A; McGrath TA; Cobey KD; Budhram B; Frank RA; Nguyen F; Salameh JP; Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; McInnes MDF
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):517-526. PubMed ID: 30051140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Increased number of systematic reviews in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2000].
Grootens KP; Assendelft WJ; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov; 147(45):2226-30. PubMed ID: 14640061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals.
Chen H; Chen CH; Jhanji V
Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23623355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Demographic characteristics of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials in orthodontic journals with impact factor.
Kanavakis G; Dombroski MM; Malouf DP; Athanasiou AE
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 25788332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics.
Fleming PS; Seehra J; Polychronopoulou A; Fedorowicz Z; Pandis N
Angle Orthod; 2013 Jan; 83(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 22720835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Publication of reviews synthesizing child health evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to identify factors associated with publication in Cochrane and non-Cochrane sources.
Hartling L; Shave K; Thomson D; Fernandes RM; Wingert A; Williams K
Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; 5(1):104. PubMed ID: 27328935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics.
Papageorgiou SN; Papadopoulos MA; Athanasiou AE
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Aug; 14(3):116-37. PubMed ID: 21771267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics.
Lempesi E; Koletsi D; Fleming PS; Pandis N
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2014 Jun; 14(2):46-52. PubMed ID: 24913524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in orthodontic literature. Where do we stand?
Koletsi D; Fleming PS; Eliades T; Pandis N
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):603-9. PubMed ID: 25667037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics and fate of orthodontic articles submitted for publication: An exploratory study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.
Farjo N; Turpin DL; Coley RY; Feng J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):680-90. PubMed ID: 26038071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.
Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
BMC Med; 2003 Nov; 1():2. PubMed ID: 14633274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
Fleming PS; Seehra J; Polychronopoulou A; Fedorowicz Z; Pandis N
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Apr; 35(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 22510325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Publication Speed, Reporting Metrics, and Citation Impact of Cardiovascular Trials Supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Gordon D; Cooper-Arnold K; Lauer M
J Am Heart Assoc; 2015 Jul; 4(8):e002292. PubMed ID: 26231845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the information of systematic reviews published in nursing journals up-to-date? a cross-sectional study.
Tam WWS; Lo KKH; Khalechelvam P; Seah J; Goh SYS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):151. PubMed ID: 29178832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
