244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25052736)
21. Additively manufactured metallic porous biomaterials based on minimal surfaces: A unique combination of topological, mechanical, and mass transport properties.
Bobbert FSL; Lietaert K; Eftekhari AA; Pouran B; Ahmadi SM; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA
Acta Biomater; 2017 Apr; 53():572-584. PubMed ID: 28213101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Preparation and mechanical properties analysis of porous structure for bone tissue engineering.
Cui J; Yi Y; Zhang J; Chai L; Jin H
Biomed Mater Eng; 2022; 33(6):465-476. PubMed ID: 35662101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development of porous titanium for biomedical applications: A comparison between loose sintering and space-holder techniques.
Torres Y; Lascano S; Bris J; Pavón J; Rodriguez JA
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Apr; 37():148-55. PubMed ID: 24582234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Properties of a porous Ti-6Al-4V implant with a low stiffness for biomedical application.
Li X; Wang CT; Zhang WG; Li YC
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Feb; 223(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 19278194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Do Surface Porosity and Pore Size Influence Mechanical Properties and Cellular Response to PEEK?
Torstrick FB; Evans NT; Stevens HY; Gall K; Guldberg RE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2373-2383. PubMed ID: 27154533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Porous TiNbZr alloy scaffolds for biomedical applications.
Wang X; Li Y; Xiong J; Hodgson PD; Wen C
Acta Biomater; 2009 Nov; 5(9):3616-24. PubMed ID: 19505597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Development and mechanical characterization of porous titanium bone substitutes.
Barbas A; Bonnet AS; Lipinski P; Pesci R; Dubois G
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 May; 9():34-44. PubMed ID: 22498281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predicting the output dimensions, porosity and elastic modulus of additive manufactured biomaterial structures targeting orthopedic implants.
Bartolomeu F; Fonseca J; Peixinho N; Alves N; Gasik M; Silva FS; Miranda G
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Nov; 99():104-117. PubMed ID: 31349147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microstructure and mechanical properties of additive manufactured porous Ti-33Nb-4Sn scaffolds for orthopaedic applications.
Cheng X; Liu S; Chen C; Chen W; Liu M; Li R; Zhang X; Zhou K
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Aug; 30(8):91. PubMed ID: 31388766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fabrication of porous-Ti6Al4V alloy by using hot pressing technique and Mg space holder for hard-tissue biomedical applications.
Aslan N; Aksakal B; Findik F
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2021 Jun; 32(7):80. PubMed ID: 34191138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the mechanical compatibility of additively manufactured porous Ti-25Ta alloy for load-bearing implant applications.
Soro N; Attar H; Brodie E; Veidt M; Molotnikov A; Dargusch MS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Sep; 97():149-158. PubMed ID: 31121433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mechanical biocompatibilities of titanium alloys for biomedical applications.
Niinomi M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jan; 1(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 19627769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Porous titanium manufactured by a novel powder tapping method using spherical salt bead space holders: Characterisation and mechanical properties.
Jia J; Siddiq AR; Kennedy AR
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Aug; 48():229-240. PubMed ID: 25957839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fatigue behavior of As-built selective laser melted titanium scaffolds with sheet-based gyroid microarchitecture for bone tissue engineering.
Kelly CN; Francovich J; Julmi S; Safranski D; Guldberg RE; Maier HJ; Gall K
Acta Biomater; 2019 Aug; 94():610-626. PubMed ID: 31125727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Research on Characterization and Biocompatibility of 3D Printed Ti-6Al-4V Pelvic Prosthesis].
Cai Y; Guo J; Fu B
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2024 May; 48(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 38863090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Particle morphology influence on mechanical and biocompatibility properties of injection molded Ti alloy powder.
Gülsoy HÖ; Gülsoy N; Calışıcı R
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(5):1861-73. PubMed ID: 25201399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Microstructure and mechanical properties of porous titanium structures fabricated by electron beam melting for cranial implants.
Moiduddin K
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Feb; 232(2):185-199. PubMed ID: 29332500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Compressive mechanical compatibility of anisotropic porous Ti6Al4V alloys in the range of physiological strain rate for cortical bone implant applications.
Li F; Li J; Kou H; Huang T; Zhou L
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Sep; 26(9):233. PubMed ID: 26384823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 3D inkjet printing of biomaterials with strength reliability and cytocompatibility: Quantitative process strategy for Ti-6Al-4V.
Barui S; Panda AK; Naskar S; Kuppuraj R; Basu S; Basu B
Biomaterials; 2019 Aug; 213():119212. PubMed ID: 31152931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
