504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25053130)
1. Two-port cholecystectomy maintains safety and feasibility in benign gallbladder diseases: a comparative study.
Lee SC; Choi BJ; Kim SJ
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):1014-9. PubMed ID: 25053130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-port versus needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.
Hosogi H; Strassel V; Martin C; Sakai Y; Saad S
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2011 Aug; 4(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 22776275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a preliminary study in 37 patients with gallbladder disease.
Kuon Lee S; You YK; Park JH; Kim HJ; Lee KK; Kim DG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Aug; 19(4):495-9. PubMed ID: 19630589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the fourth port routinely required for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Our three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience.
Ciftci A; Yazicioglu MB; Tiryaki C; Turgut HT; Subasi O; Ilgoz M; Civil O; Yildiz SY
Ir J Med Sci; 2016 Nov; 185(4):909-912. PubMed ID: 27582090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incisional hernia rate may increase after single-port cholecystectomy.
Alptekin H; Yilmaz H; Acar F; Kafali ME; Sahin M
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Oct; 22(8):731-7. PubMed ID: 23039699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.
Pan MX; Jiang ZS; Cheng Y; Xu XP; Zhang Z; Qin JS; He GL; Xu TC; Zhou CJ; Liu HY; Gao Y
World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 19(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 23372363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transumbilical multiple-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TUMP-LC): a prospective analysis of 50 initial patients.
Roy P; De A
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 Apr; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 20374010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and feasibility for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in local community hospital: a retrospective comparison with conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Ikeda N; Ueno M; Kanamura T; Kojima Y; Nakagawa K; Ishioka K; Sasaki Y; Sho M; Sakaguchi H; Hidaka S; Ochi T; Nakajima Y
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Feb; 23(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 23386147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do height and weight affect the feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
Meillat H; Birnbaum DJ; Fara R; Mancini J; Berdah S; Bège T
Surg Endosc; 2015 Dec; 29(12):3594-9. PubMed ID: 25759236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparative Study of Outcomes Between Single-Site Robotic and Multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.
Balachandran B; Hufford TA; Mustafa T; Kochar K; Sulo S; Khorsand J
World J Surg; 2017 May; 41(5):1246-1253. PubMed ID: 28058471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single incision with SPIDER surgical system are comparable to conventional multiport technique: one surgeon's experience.
Escobar-Dominguez JE; Garcia-Quintero P; Hernandez-Murcia C; Verdeja JC
Surg Endosc; 2016 Nov; 30(11):4793-4799. PubMed ID: 26932549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with miniaturized instrumentation in 50 consecutive cases.
Reardon PR; Kamelgard JI; Applebaum B; Rossman L; Brunicardi FC
World J Surg; 1999 Feb; 23(2):128-31; discussion 131-2. PubMed ID: 9880420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative factors predicting the need for additional ports during single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Sato N; Yabuki K; Kudo Y; Koga A; Kohi S; Tamura T; Shibao K; Hirata K
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2016 Aug; 9(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 27113627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory setting.
Qu JW; Xin C; Wang GY; Yuan ZQ; Li KW
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2019 Jun; 18(3):273-277. PubMed ID: 31056482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Lin H; Zhang J; Li X; Li Y; Su S
Updates Surg; 2023 Jan; 75(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 36205830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review.
Migliore M; Arezzo A; Arolfo S; Passera R; Morino M
Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4716-4727. PubMed ID: 29943057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Port site metastases a year after initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Should the use of retrieval bags during laparoscopic cholecystectomy be the new gold standard?
Petryshyn N; Dražić T; Hogendorf P; Strzelczyk J; Strzałka A; Szwedziak K; Durczyński A
Pol Przegl Chir; 2021 May; 93(6):61-65. PubMed ID: 36169533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. From multi-incision to single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy step-by-step: one surgeon's self-taught experience and retrospective analysis.
Chuang SH
Asian J Surg; 2013 Jan; 36(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 23270818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total 5-mm port approach: a feasible technique for both elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Bender K; Lewin J; O'Rourke H; Hugh FC; O'Rourke N; Hugh TJ
ANZ J Surg; 2018 Nov; 88(11):E751-E755. PubMed ID: 29687556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Comparison of Four-Port, Two-Port Without Suspension Suture and Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Results.
Sulu B; Allahverdi TD; Altun H; Koksal N
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 26935504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
