266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25053210)
1. Effect of beam steering on the visibility of echogenic and non-echogenic needles: a laboratory study.
Uppal V; Sondekoppam RV; Ganapathy S
Can J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 61(10):909-15. PubMed ID: 25053210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Beam Steering on Echogenic and Nonechogenic Needle Visibility at 40°, 50°, and 60° Needle Insertion Angles.
Prabhakar C; Uppal V; Sondekoppam RV
Anesth Analg; 2018 Jun; 126(6):1926-1929. PubMed ID: 29116966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhanced visual acuity with echogenic needles in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block: a randomized, comparative, observer-blinded study.
Abbal B; Choquet O; Gourari A; Bouic N; Massone A; Biboulet P; Bringuier S; Capdevila X
Minerva Anestesiol; 2015 Apr; 81(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 25057930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective and subjective comparison of the visibility of three echogenic needles and a nonechogenic needle on older ultrasound devices.
Nakagawa K; Kamiya T; Arakawa K; Akiyama S; Sakai K
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2015 Mar; 53(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 25662188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-dimensional mapping to assess direction and magnitude of needle tip error in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia.
Hebard S; Hocking G; Murray K
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2011 Nov; 39(6):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22165361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Echogenic regional anaesthesia needles: a comparison study in Thiel cadavers.
Guo S; Schwab A; McLeod G; Corner G; Cochran S; Eisma R; Soames R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):702-7. PubMed ID: 22390992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomised, single-blind technical study comparing the ultrasonic visibility of smooth-surfaced and textured needles in a soft embalmed cadaver model.
Munirama S; Joy J; Columb M; Habershaw R; Eisma R; Corner G; Cochran S; McLeod G
Anaesthesia; 2015 May; 70(5):537-42. PubMed ID: 25376431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of the visibility and block characteristics of a stimulating needle and catheter vs an echogenic needle and catheter for sciatic nerve block with a low-frequency ultrasound probe.
Brookes J; Sondekoppam R; Armstrong K; Uppal V; Dhir S; Terlecki M; Ganapathy S
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Dec; 115(6):912-9. PubMed ID: 26582852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visibility of ultrasound-guided echogenic needle and its potential in clinical delivery of regional anesthesia.
Miura M; Takeyama K; Suzuki T
Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 2014 Jul; 39(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 25027252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic identification of needle tip by specialists and novices: a blinded comparison of 5 regional block needles in fresh human cadavers.
Edgcombe H; Hocking G
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2010; 35(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 20301826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in tip visibility and nerve block parameters between two echogenic needles during a simulation study with inexperienced anesthesia trainees.
Kilicaslan A; Topal A; Tavlan A; Erol A; Otelcioglu S
J Anesth; 2014 Jun; 28(3):460-2. PubMed ID: 24127134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Echogenic technology can improve needle visibility during ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.
Hebard S; Hocking G
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2011; 36(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 21425515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved needle visualization with electronic beam steering: proof of concept.
Barr RG
Ultrasound Q; 2012 Jun; 28(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 22634767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Compound imaging technology and echogenic needle design: effects on needle visibility and tissue imaging.
Wiesmann T; Bornträger A; Zoremba M; Neff M; Wulf H; Steinfeldt T
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2013; 38(5):452-5. PubMed ID: 23759709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound visibility of needles used for regional nerve block: an in vitro study.
Schafhalter-Zoppoth I; McCulloch CE; Gray AT
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2004; 29(5):480-8. PubMed ID: 15372394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Novel echogenic needle for ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block "Hakko type CCR"].
Takayama W; Yasumura R; Kaneko T; Kobayashi Y; Kamada T; Yoshikawa T; Aoyama Y
Masui; 2009 Apr; 58(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 19364022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing the safety and practice of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: the role of echogenic technology.
Hocking G; Mitchell CH
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2012 Oct; 25(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 22825047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nominal logistic regression analysis of variables determining needle visibility in ultrasound images - a full factorial cadaver study.
Dinges HC; Hoeft J; Cornelius VM; Steinfeldt T; Wiesmann T; Wulf H; Schubert AK
BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):369. PubMed ID: 37950214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced Needle Visualization: advantages and indications of an ultrasound software package.
Takatani J; Takeshima N; Okuda K; Uchino T; Hagiwara S; Noguchi T
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2012 Sep; 40(5):856-60. PubMed ID: 22934870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of the benefits and pitfalls of phantoms in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.
Hocking G; Hebard S; Mitchell CH
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2011; 36(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 21425513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
