190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25053542)
1. Second opinion in breast pathology: policy, practice and perception.
Geller BM; Nelson HD; Carney PA; Weaver DL; Onega T; Allison KH; Frederick PD; Tosteson AN; Elmore JG
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):955-60. PubMed ID: 25053542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.
Elmore JG; Tosteson AN; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Jackson SL; Weaver DL
BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3069. PubMed ID: 27334105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies.
Geller BM; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Onega T; Carney PA; Tosteson ANA; Elmore JG
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Nov; 70(11):947-953. PubMed ID: 28465449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathologists' Use of Second Opinions in Interpretation of Melanocytic Cutaneous Lesions: Policies, Practices, and Perceptions.
Geller BM; Frederick PD; Knezevich SR; Lott JP; Nelson HD; Titus LJ; Carney PA; Tosteson ANA; Onega TL; Barnhill RL; Weinstock MA; Elder DE; Piepkorn MW; Elmore JG
Dermatol Surg; 2018 Feb; 44(2):177-185. PubMed ID: 28858936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.
Elmore JG; Longton GM; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Allison KH; Schnitt SJ; O'Malley FP; Weaver DL
JAMA; 2015 Mar; 313(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 25781441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-observer variability between general pathologists and a specialist in breast pathology in the diagnosis of lobular neoplasia, columnar cell lesions, atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Gomes DS; Porto SS; Balabram D; Gobbi H
Diagn Pathol; 2014 Jun; 9():121. PubMed ID: 24948027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying and processing the gap between perceived and actual agreement in breast pathology interpretation.
Carney PA; Allison KH; Oster NV; Frederick PD; Morgan TR; Geller BM; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):717-26. PubMed ID: 27056072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.
Onega T; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Tosteson ANA; Carney PA; Geller BM; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Oster NV; Pepe MS; Elmore JG
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 80():39-47. PubMed ID: 28535496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast pathology review: does it make a difference?
Romanoff AM; Cohen A; Schmidt H; Weltz CR; Jaffer SM; Nagi CS; Bleiweiss IJ; Port ER
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(11):3504-8. PubMed ID: 24859936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digitized whole slides for breast pathology interpretation: current practices and perceptions.
Onega T; Weaver D; Geller B; Oster N; Tosteson AN; Carney PA; Nelson H; Allison KH; O'Malley FP; Schnitt SJ; Elmore JG
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Oct; 27(5):642-8. PubMed ID: 24682769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Consultation in breast surgical pathology: interobserver diagnostic variability of atypical intraductal proliferative lesions].
Perez AA; Balabram D; Salles Mde A; Gobbi H
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 35(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 23752581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathology resident attitudes and opinions about pathologists' assistants.
Grzybicki DM; Vrbin CM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Jun; 127(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 12741888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Interobserver reproducibility in the pathologic diagnosis of borderline ductal proliferative breast diseases].
Wei B; Bu H; Zhu CR; Guo LX; Chen HJ; Zhao C; Zhang P; Chen DY; Tang Y; Jiang Y
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Nov; 35(6):849-53. PubMed ID: 15573772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Region of interest identification and diagnostic agreement in breast pathology.
Nagarkar DB; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Brunyé TT; Carney PA; Rendi MH; Beck AH; Frederick PD; Shapiro LG; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1004-11. PubMed ID: 27198567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Machine Learning of Breast Pathology Structures for Automated Differentiation of Breast Cancer and High-Risk Proliferative Lesions.
Mercan E; Mehta S; Bartlett J; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e198777. PubMed ID: 31397859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Demographic and practice characteristics of pathologists who enjoy breast tissue interpretation.
Oster NV; Geller BM; Carney PA; Reisch LM; Onega T; Weaver DL; Frederick P; Elmore JG
Breast; 2015 Apr; 24(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 25554017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in breast cancer reports after pathology second opinion.
Marco V; Muntal T; García-Hernandez F; Cortes J; Gonzalez B; Rubio IT
Breast J; 2014; 20(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 24689830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast carcinoma in sclerosing adenosis: a clinicopathological and immunophenotypical analysis on 206 lesions.
Yu BH; Tang SX; Xu XL; Cheng YF; Bi R; Shui RH; Tu XY; Lu HF; Zhou XY; Yang WT
J Clin Pathol; 2018 Jun; 71(6):546-553. PubMed ID: 29436376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Second opinion strategies in breast pathology: a decision analysis addressing over-treatment, under-treatment, and care costs.
Tosteson ANA; Yang Q; Nelson HD; Longton G; Soneji SS; Pepe M; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Elmore JG; Weaver DL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 167(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 28879558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should pathologists send all or only selected slides for patient-requested interlaboratory second opinion?
Renshaw MA; Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Nov; 132(5):763-6. PubMed ID: 19846819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
