These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25053760)

  • 21. Multichannel functional testing in normal subjects, glaucoma suspects, and glaucoma patients.
    Antón A; Capilla P; Morilla-Grasa A; Luque MJ; Artigas JM; Felipe A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 53(13):8386-95. PubMed ID: 23060138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing the CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test to the near Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in normally-sighted young adults.
    Rijal S; Cheng H; Marsack JD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Sep; 41(5):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 34418124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test.
    Arditi A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2225-9. PubMed ID: 15914645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contrast sensitivity assessment for early detection of hydroxychloroquine toxicity.
    Singla E; Ichhpujani P; Sharma U; Kumar S
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; ():11206721211010612. PubMed ID: 33863258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study examining how glaucoma affects quality of life and visually-related function over 4 years: design and methodology.
    Waisbourd M; Parker S; Ekici F; Martinez P; Murphy R; Scully K; Wizov SS; Hark LA; Spaeth GL
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 15():91. PubMed ID: 26231376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Hawkins AS; Szlyk JP; Ardickas Z; Alexander KR; Wilensky JT
    J Glaucoma; 2003 Apr; 12(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12671468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.
    Dougherty BE; Flom RE; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):970-5. PubMed ID: 16317373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contrast sensitivity measurement with 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract.
    Hong YT; Kim SW; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 20362843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Converting LEA to Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score in neuro-ophthalmology patients.
    Prihatningtias R; Hardiyanti D; Valencia L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 72(Suppl 3):S505-S508. PubMed ID: 38648459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measuring contrast sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests.
    Bühren J; Terzi E; Bach M; Wesemann W; Kohnen T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 16699441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests.
    Elliott DB; Bullimore MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jan; 34(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 8425818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of an iPad test of letter contrast sensitivity.
    Kollbaum PS; Jansen ME; Kollbaum EJ; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 91(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 24413274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intersession repeatability of contrast sensitivity scores in age-related macular degeneration.
    Patel PJ; Chen FK; Rubin GS; Tufail A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 50(6):2621-5. PubMed ID: 19218618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry.
    Katz J; Quigley HA; Sommer A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jul; 36(8):1658-64. PubMed ID: 7601645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Repeatability of contrast sensitivity testing in patients with age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, and cataract.
    Kara S; Gencer B; Ersan I; Arikan S; Kocabiyik O; Tufan HA; Comez A
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2016; 79(5):323-327. PubMed ID: 27982213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of the CSV-1000 in adults and children.
    Kelly SA; Pang Y; Klemencic S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 89(8):1172-81. PubMed ID: 22797510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Test-retest Repeatability of the Ohio Contrast Cards.
    Osman M; Njeru SM; Hopkins GR; Brown AM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 98(9):1070-1077. PubMed ID: 34570031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart.
    Elliott DB; Sanderson K; Conkey A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jan; 10(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2330208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optic disc imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: variability and agreement study with Heidelberg retinal tomograph.
    Yang B; Ye C; Yu M; Liu S; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Sep; 119(9):1852-7. PubMed ID: 22572035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.