These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25053760)

  • 41. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. I. Baseline sensitivity and specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter and the GDx nerve fibre analyser.
    Heeg GP; Blanksma LJ; Hardus PL; Jansonius NM
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Feb; 83(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 15715556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Value of Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart for evaluation of visual system in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Wender M
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2007; 41(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 17530576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Evaluation of contrast sensitivity test in the diagnosis of early glaucoma].
    Yuan YS
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 2507258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thickness measurement with the RTVue-100 optical coherence tomograph.
    Garas A; Vargha P; Holló G
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):738-46. PubMed ID: 20079538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Test-retest reliability of the CSV-1000 contrast test and its relationship to glaucoma therapy.
    Pomerance GN; Evans DW
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Aug; 35(9):3357-61. PubMed ID: 8056510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The SKILL Card. An acuity test of reduced luminance and contrast. Smith-Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance.
    Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Brabyn J; Schneck ME; Jampolsky A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 38(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 9008645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reliability of high- and low-contrast letter charts.
    Reeves BC; Wood JM; Hill AR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Jan; 13(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 8510943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Contrast-sensitivity testing with scanning-laser ophthalmoscope stimulation in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients.
    Horn F; Budde W; Korth M
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1996 Nov; 5(6):428-34. PubMed ID: 9479531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma.
    Budenz DL; Michael A; Chang RT; McSoley J; Katz J
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 15629813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Wilensky JT; Hawkins A
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():213-7; discussion 217-8. PubMed ID: 11797309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Heidelberg retina tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score: reproducibility and measurement of progression.
    Strouthidis NG; Demirel S; Asaoka R; Cossio-Zuniga C; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):724-9. PubMed ID: 20045564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Electrophysiological and psychophysical testing of vision in glaucoma.
    Bodis-Wollner I
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1989 Feb; 33 Suppl():301-7. PubMed ID: 2655143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Computer simulation of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma: performance of event and trend analyses.
    Yu M; Weinreb RN; Yiu C; Liu S; Or MK; Ye C; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Dec; 52(13):9674-83. PubMed ID: 22003104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The validity of current clinical tests of contrast sensitivity and their ability to predict reading speed in low vision.
    Leat SJ; Woo GC
    Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 6)():893-9. PubMed ID: 9537154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter® on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma].
    Hasler S; Stürmer J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Apr; 229(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 22495996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Performance of the 24-2-5 frequency doubling technology screening test: a prospective case study.
    Spry PG; Hussin HM; Sparrow JM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1345-9. PubMed ID: 17389743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Validity, reliability, and repeatability of the useful field of view test in persons with normal vision and patients with glaucoma.
    Bentley SA; LeBlanc RP; Nicolela MT; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):6763-9. PubMed ID: 22956614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Simple rapid contrast sensitivity test in diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Korth M; Horn F; Martus P
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Aug; 203(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 8231049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of temporal and spatiotemporal contrast-sensitivity tests in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Horn F; Martus P; Korth M
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Mar; 4(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 7795517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.