These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25053937)

  • 21. The role of facial colour and luminance in visual and audiovisual speech perception.
    McCotter MV; Jordan TR
    Perception; 2003; 32(8):921-36. PubMed ID: 14580139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Atypical audiovisual word processing in school-age children with a history of specific language impairment: an event-related potential study.
    Kaganovich N; Schumaker J; Rowland C
    J Neurodev Disord; 2016; 8(1):33. PubMed ID: 27597881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrophysiological evidence for speech-specific audiovisual integration.
    Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():115-21. PubMed ID: 24291340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of periodic interruptions on cortical entrainment to speech.
    Hambrook DA; Soni S; Tata MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Dec; 121():58-68. PubMed ID: 30385119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Motor Network Reduces Multisensory Illusory Perception.
    Murakami T; Abe M; Wiratman W; Fujiwara J; Okamoto M; Mizuochi-Endo T; Iwabuchi T; Makuuchi M; Yamashita A; Tiksnadi A; Chang FY; Kubo H; Matsuda N; Kobayashi S; Eifuku S; Ugawa Y
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(45):9679-9688. PubMed ID: 30249803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hearing-impaired listeners show increased audiovisual benefit when listening to speech in noise.
    Puschmann S; Daeglau M; Stropahl M; Mirkovic B; Rosemann S; Thiel CM; Debener S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():261-268. PubMed ID: 30978494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. "Paying" attention to audiovisual speech: Do incongruent stimuli incur greater costs?
    Brown VA; Strand JF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1743-1756. PubMed ID: 31197661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How prior expectations shape multisensory perception.
    Gau R; Noppeney U
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):876-886. PubMed ID: 26419391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.
    Crosse MJ; Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9888-95. PubMed ID: 27656026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual restoration of a "missing" speech sound: auditory induction or illusion?
    Repp BH
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):14-32. PubMed ID: 1549420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vision of tongue movements bias auditory speech perception.
    D'Ausilio A; Bartoli E; Maffongelli L; Berry JJ; Fadiga L
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():85-91. PubMed ID: 25172391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Principle of Inverse Effectiveness in Audiovisual Speech Perception.
    van de Rijt LPH; Roye A; Mylanus EAM; van Opstal AJ; van Wanrooij MM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():335. PubMed ID: 31611780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using EEG and stimulus context to probe the modelling of auditory-visual speech.
    Paris T; Kim J; Davis C
    Cortex; 2016 Feb; 75():220-230. PubMed ID: 26045213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The level of audiovisual print-speech integration deficits in dyslexia.
    Kronschnabel J; Brem S; Maurer U; Brandeis D
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():245-61. PubMed ID: 25084224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The continuity illusion adapts to the auditory scene.
    Riecke L; Mendelsohn D; Schreiner C; Formisano E
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 19015017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of audio-visual integration on the detection of masked speech and non-speech sounds.
    Eramudugolla R; Henderson R; Mattingley JB
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Feb; 75(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 21067852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study.
    Eskelund K; MacDonald EN; Andersen TS
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.