174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25055269)
1. Preoperative assessment of prostate cancer using prebiopsy MRI.
Min JH; Park BK; Park JJ; Park SY; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 25055269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Staging of prostate cancer: value of the combined information of endorectal MRI, biopsy Gleason score, and preoperative PSA level].
Wetter A; Ajdukovic AN; Fliessbach K; Lehnert T; Engl T; Jacobi V; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2006 Apr; 178(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 16607587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative prediction of neurovascular bundle involvement of localized prostate cancer by combined T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging of magnetic resonance imaging, number of positive biopsy cores, and Gleason score.
Naiki T; Okamura T; Nagata D; Mori Y; Kawai N; Ogawa K; Akita H; Hashimoto Y; Tozawa K; Kohri K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 21790224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis.
Oto A; Yang C; Kayhan A; Tretiakova M; Antic T; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Karczmar GS; Stadler WM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1382-90. PubMed ID: 22109293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate cancer detection by prebiopsy 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
Nishida S; Kinoshita H; Mishima T; Kurokawa H; Sakaida N; Matsuda T
Int J Urol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):653-8. PubMed ID: 21790792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Horiguchi A; Nakashima J; Horiguchi Y; Nakagawa K; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Marumo K; Murai M
Prostate; 2003 Jun; 56(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12746843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between the preoperative serum prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, and clinical staging with pathological outcome following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Indian experience.
Singh P; Dogra PN; Gupta NP; Nayyar R; Seth A; Javali TD; Kumar R
Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(4):483-7. PubMed ID: 22293265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High diagnostic ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect anterior prostate cancer missed by transrectal 12-core biopsy.
Komai Y; Numao N; Yoshida S; Matsuoka Y; Nakanishi Y; Ishii C; Koga F; Saito K; Masuda H; Fujii Y; Kawakami S; Kihara K
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):867-73. PubMed ID: 23542406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schultz D; Schnall M; Tomaszewski JE; Wein A
J Urol; 1995 Jul; 154(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 7539857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence.
Corcoran NM; Hong MK; Casey RG; Hurtado-Coll A; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Hovens CM; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E202-10. PubMed ID: 21443656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of prebiopsy multifunctional and morphologic MRI combined with free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio in the detection of prostate cancer.
Vilanova JC; Barceló-Vidal C; Comet J; Boada M; Barceló J; Ferrer J; Albanell J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):W715-22. PubMed ID: 21606259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.
Krishna S; McInnes M; Lim C; Lim R; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):W365-W373. PubMed ID: 28981356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Periprostatic fat thickness on MRI: correlation with Gleason score in prostate cancer.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SY; Kim SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):W43-7. PubMed ID: 25539273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
