125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25055945)
1. [Investigation of measurement accuracy of factors used for detective quantum efficiency measurement in digital radiography].
Kunitomo H; Koyama S; Higashide R; Ichikawa K; Hattori M; Okada Y; Hayashi N; Sawada M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Jul; 70(7):653-61. PubMed ID: 25055945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.
Marshall NW; Mackenzie A; Honey ID
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. NPWE model observer as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis of digital detectors in general radiography.
Van Peteghem N; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N575-N591. PubMed ID: 27754987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical Note: Impact on detective quantum efficiency of edge angle determination method by International Electrotechnical Commission methodology for cardiac x-ray image detectors.
Gislason-Lee AJ; Tunstall CM; Kengyelics SK; Cowen AR; Davies AG
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4423-7. PubMed ID: 26233172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency.
Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Pattacini P; Ginocchi V; Iori M
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DQE of wireless digital detectors: comparative performance with differing filtration schemes.
Samei E; Murphy S; Christianson O
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081910. PubMed ID: 23927324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative analysis of effects of the grid specifications on the quality of digital radiography images.
Lee S; Chung W
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Jun; 42(2):553-561. PubMed ID: 30989596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonstationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: II. Transfer functions.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):505-516. PubMed ID: 30488455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Ferrari P; Tassoni D
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy validation of incident photon fluence on detective quantum efficiency in mammography.
Haba T; Koyama S; Otani N
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Dec; 41(4):847-852. PubMed ID: 30151709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency in digital detectors consistent with the IEC 62220-1 standard: practical considerations regarding the choice of filter material.
Ranger NT; Samei E; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2305-11. PubMed ID: 16121586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detective quantum efficiency (DQE) in PET scanners: A simulation study.
Karpetas GE; Michail CM; Fountos GP; Kalyvas NI; Valais IG; Kandarakis IS; Panayiotakis GS
Appl Radiat Isot; 2017 Jul; 125():154-162. PubMed ID: 28437735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MTF and DQE enhancement using an apodized-aperture x-ray detector design.
Nano TF; Escartin T; Ismailova E; Karim KS; Lindström J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4525-4535. PubMed ID: 28636792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
