These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. White hat bias: a threat to the integrity of scientific reporting. Cope MB; Allison DB Acta Paediatr; 2010 Nov; 99(11):1615-7. PubMed ID: 21039822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Industry sponsorship in research and publishing: who is really to blame for perceived bias? Amsden GW Ann Pharmacother; 2004 Apr; 38(4):714-6. PubMed ID: 14982974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias. Formann AK Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The toxicity/safety of processed free glutamic acid (MSG): a study in suppression of information. Samuels A Account Res; 1999; 6(4):259-310. PubMed ID: 11657840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Small study on industry trial sponsorship leads to big questions about quality and bias. Twombly R J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Jul; 99(13):988-90. PubMed ID: 17596566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bias in the design, interpretation, and publication of industry-sponsored clinical research. Hammerschmidt D Minn Med; 2008 Jun; 91(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 18616022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Control of data, authorship, and responsibility for clinical trials publications. Freeman WR Ophthalmology; 2005 Sep; 112(9):1485-6. PubMed ID: 16139664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Strategies for Addressing a Broader Definition of Conflicts of Interest. McKinney RE; Pierce HH JAMA; 2017 May; 317(17):1727-1728. PubMed ID: 28464167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical journal cites misleading drug research. Grady D N Y Times Web; 1999 Nov; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11648133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Conflicts of interest may bias research into sugary drinks and obesity. Wise J BMJ; 2014 Jan; 348():f7654. PubMed ID: 24385551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Suppressing research data: methods, context, accountability, and responses. Martin B Account Res; 1999; 6(4):333-72. PubMed ID: 11657841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive reasons for publishing negative findings. Connor JT Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Sep; 103(9):2181-3. PubMed ID: 18671812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Merck & Co: Lakartidningen is wrong about us]. Ringart T Lakartidningen; 2008 Nov 12-18; 105(46):3358; author reply 3358-9. PubMed ID: 19062629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Publishing of scientific studies is no longer dependent on considerations of space in medical journals]. Eliasson M Lakartidningen; 2001 Nov; 98(47):5394. PubMed ID: 11763644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Researchers' links with biomed industry lead to bias in clinical trials. Matthews R New Sci; 2003 Feb; 177(2380):8. PubMed ID: 14587489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start. Thomas L; Peterson ED JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(8):773-4. PubMed ID: 22910753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Suppression, bias, and selection in science: the case of cancer research. Hess DJ Account Res; 1999; 6(4):245-57. PubMed ID: 11657839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]