178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25057094)
1. Experimental and computational investigation of Morse taper conometric system reliability for the definition of fixed connections between dental implants and prostheses.
Bressan E; Lops D; Tomasi C; Ricci S; Stocchero M; Carniel EL
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Jul; 228(7):674-81. PubMed ID: 25057094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection.
Merz BR; Hunenbart S; Belser UC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):519-26. PubMed ID: 10960985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical Analysis of Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Implant-Abutment Connections.
Dayrell AC; Noritomi PY; Takahashi JM; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; dos Santos MB
Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):621-3. PubMed ID: 26523723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of vertical interarch space and abutment height on stress distributions: a 3D finite element analysis.
Naveau A; Renault P; Pierrisnard L
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 19645311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficiency considerations for the purely tapered interference fit (TIF) abutments used in dental implants.
Bozkaya D; Müftü S
J Biomech Eng; 2004 Aug; 126(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 15543856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Compressive resistance of abutments with different diameters and transmucosal heights in Morse-taper implants.
Lillo R; Parra C; Fuentes R; Borie E; Engelke W; Beltrán V
Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 25831107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Carvalho PS; Goiato MC
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21851260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative stress analyses of fixed free-end osseointegrated prostheses using the finite element method.
Melo C; Matsushita Y; Koyano K; Hirowatari H; Suetsugu T
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8699521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC; Sahin S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 12705305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the Prosthetic Index on Fracture Resistance of Morse Taper Dental Implants.
Zancopé K; Dias Resende CC; Castro CG; Salatti RC; Domingues das Neves F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1333-1337. PubMed ID: 29140377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanics of the tapered interference fit in dental implants.
Bozkaya D; Müftü S
J Biomech; 2003 Nov; 36(11):1649-58. PubMed ID: 14522206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retention System and Splinting on Morse Taper Implants in the Posterior Maxilla by 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DAF; Batista VES; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer DP
Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29267521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of internal hexagonal index on removal torque and tensile removal force of different Morse taper connection abutments.
de Oliveira Silva TS; Mendes Alencar SM; da Silva Valente V; de Moura CDVS
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):621-627. PubMed ID: 27881313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probability of Failure of Internal Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants with Different Bone Levels: A Mechanical Test and Probabilistic Fatigue.
Prados-Privado M; Gehrke SA; Rojo R; Prados-Frutos JC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1266-1273. PubMed ID: 30427957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification.
Ding TA; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL; Miller BH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 14696662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.
Zhang WT; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Chen YF; Ding YD; Yang F; Wang LH
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 36180871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical design, analysis, and laboratory testing of a dental implant with axial flexibility similar to natural tooth with periodontal ligament.
Pektaş Ö; Tönük E
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1117-25. PubMed ID: 25378380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
