These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25058131)

  • 1. How should screening breast US be audited? The BI-RADS perspective.
    Sickles EA; D'Orsi CJ
    Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):316-20. PubMed ID: 25058131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How should screening breast US be audited? The patient perspective.
    Berg WA; Mendelson EB
    Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 25058130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues.
    D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):751-63, v. PubMed ID: 17888766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant mammary lesions with special regard to the BI-RADS((R)) classification system in mammography].
    Boehm T; Garzoli E; Marincek B
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2002; 42(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 12373023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The breast ultrasound lexicon: breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS).
    Sedgwick E
    Semin Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 46(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 22035666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening.
    Vinnicombe S
    Cancer Imaging; 2016 Jul; 16(1):17. PubMed ID: 27456031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BI-RADS
    Spak DA; Plaxco JS; Santiago L; Dryden MJ; Dogan BE
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Mar; 98(3):179-190. PubMed ID: 28131457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tailored breast cancer screening program with microdose mammography, US, and MR Imaging: short-term results of a pilot study in 40-49-year-old women.
    Venturini E; Losio C; Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; Fedele I; Tacchini S; Schiani E; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Panzeri MM; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A
    Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 23579052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imaging of the breast.
    Birjawi G; El Zein Y
    J Med Liban; 2009; 57(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 19459577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Neddle-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer].
    Becerra-Alcántara GI; Círigo-Villagómez LL; Ramos-Medina F; Robledo-Martínez H; Mar-Merinos CG; Panzi-Altamirano RM
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Jul; 83(7):400-7. PubMed ID: 26422910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
    Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management.
    Raza S; Goldkamp AL; Chikarmane SA; Birdwell RL
    Radiographics; 2010 Sep; 30(5):1199-213. PubMed ID: 20833845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.
    Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Seo M; Koo HR; Chu AJ; Gweon HM; Cho N; Moon WK
    Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24955927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
    Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients.
    Le-Petross HT; Shetty MK
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21782116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition.
    Rao AA; Feneis J; Lalonde C; Ojeda-Fournier H
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(3):623-39. PubMed ID: 27082663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Stereotactically and sonographically guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a national consensus for Austria].
    Helbich TH; Buchberger W; Rudas M;
    Rofo; 2002 Apr; 174(4):517-22. PubMed ID: 12465616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.