These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25058412)
1. Differential effect of one versus two hands on visual processing. Bush WS; Vecera SP Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):232-7. PubMed ID: 25058412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways. Gozli DG; West GL; Pratt J Cognition; 2012 Aug; 124(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 22633129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hand position biases processing toward task irrelevant flankers. Bush WS; Vecera SP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 26389613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Handedness and Graspability Modify Shifts of Visuospatial Attention to Near-Hand Objects. Colman HA; Remington RW; Kritikos A PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170542. PubMed ID: 28125635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared. Kraft A; Pape N; Hagendorf H; Schmidt S; Naito A; Brandt SA Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1133(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 17174284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Slower attentional disengagement but faster perceptual processing near the hand. Thomas T; Sunny MM Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():40-47. PubMed ID: 28147264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial coordinate systems for tactile spatial attention depend on developmental vision: evidence from event-related potentials in sighted and congenitally blind adult humans. Röder B; Föcker J; Hötting K; Spence C Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 28(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 18702719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contributions of parvocellular and magnocellular pathways to visual perception near the hands are not fixed, but can be dynamically altered. Goodhew SC; Clarke R Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 26620956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How hand placement modulates interference from extraneous stimuli. Murchison NM; Proctor RW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):340-52. PubMed ID: 25239096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual rightward spatial bias varies as a function of age. Takio F; Koivisto M; Tuominen T; Laukka SJ; Hämäläinen H Laterality; 2013; 18(1):44-67. PubMed ID: 23231544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention. Moore T; Fallah M J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jan; 91(1):152-62. PubMed ID: 13679398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early visual selection in near and far space: an event-related potential study. Kasai T Neuroreport; 2008 Jun; 19(9):961-4. PubMed ID: 18521001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Focused visual attention distorts distance perception away from the attentional locus. Wardak C; Denève S; Ben Hamed S Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):535-45. PubMed ID: 21147135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduced object-based perception in the near-hand space. Suh J; Abrams RA Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3403-12. PubMed ID: 26289483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A hand in blindsight: hand placement near target improves size perception in the blind visual field. Brown LE; Kroliczak G; Demonet JF; Goodale MA Neuropsychologia; 2008 Feb; 46(3):786-802. PubMed ID: 18206962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Slow fluctuations in attentional control of sensory cortex. Kam JW; Dao E; Farley J; Fitzpatrick K; Smallwood J; Schooler JW; Handy TC J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 23(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 20146593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]