These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25058812)

  • 1. Optimized loudness-function estimation for categorical loudness scaling data.
    Oetting D; Brand T; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():16-27. PubMed ID: 25058812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Recruitment detection--a comparison of category loudness scaling and classical supra-threshold audiometry].
    Kiessling J; Pfreimer C; Schubert M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 8851113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Categorical loudness scaling and equal-loudness contours in listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.
    Rasetshwane DM; Trevino AC; Gombert JN; Liebig-Trehearn L; Kopun JG; Jesteadt W; Neely ST; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):1899-913. PubMed ID: 25920842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of categorical loudness scaling and its relation to threshold.
    Al-Salim SC; Kopun JG; Neely ST; Jesteadt W; Stiegemann B; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):567-78. PubMed ID: 20588122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Loudness functions with air and bone conduction stimulation in normal-hearing subjects using a categorical loudness scaling procedure.
    Stenfelt S; Zeitooni M
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():85-92. PubMed ID: 23562775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deriving loudness growth functions from categorical loudness scaling data.
    Wróblewski M; Rasetshwane DM; Neely ST; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):3660. PubMed ID: 29289103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-modality matching: a tool for measuring loudness in sensorineural impairment.
    Hellman RP
    Ear Hear; 1999 Jun; 20(3):193-213. PubMed ID: 10386847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between the acoustic reflex threshold and levels of loudness categories in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):308-11. PubMed ID: 10582531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea.
    Huss M; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3283-94. PubMed ID: 14714809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest reliability of loudness scaling.
    Robinson K; Gatehouse S
    Ear Hear; 1996 Apr; 17(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 8698158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The contour test of loudness perception.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Taylor IM; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):388-400. PubMed ID: 9360862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The acoustic reflex threshold: not predictive for loudness perception in normally-hearing listeners.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):303-7. PubMed ID: 10582530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of auditory nonlinearity for listeners with different hearing losses using temporal masking and categorical loudness scaling.
    Jürgens T; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):177-91. PubMed ID: 21669269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between the uncomfortable loudness level and the acoustic reflex threshold for pure tones in normally-hearing and impaired listeners--a meta-analysis.
    Olsen SO
    Audiology; 1999; 38(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 10206514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of categorical loudness scaling in the electrical domain.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; Stainsby T; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 53(6):409-17. PubMed ID: 24720542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing growth of loudness in children by cross-modality matching.
    Serpanos YC; Gravel JS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):190-202. PubMed ID: 10783922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of hearing loss, centre frequency, and bandwidth on the shape of loudness functions in categorical loudness scaling.
    Brand T; Hohmann V
    Audiology; 2001; 40(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 11409767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.
    Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral and binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Oetting D; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():179-192. PubMed ID: 27006003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimates of loudness, loudness discomfort, and the auditory dynamic range: normative estimates, comparison of procedures, and test-retest reliability.
    Sherlock LP; Formby C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Feb; 16(2):85-100. PubMed ID: 15807048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.