196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25059712)
21. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries.
Senel B; Kamburoglu K; Uçok O; Yüksel SP; Ozen T; Avsever H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Dec; 39(8):501-11. PubMed ID: 21062944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of spatial resolution and bit depth on detection of small caries lesions with digital receptors.
Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Gotfredsen E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Mar; 103(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 17321456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Extraoral Bitewings Compared to Intraoral Bitewings in Detection of Interproximal Caries.
Felemban OM; Loo CY; Ramesh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 33893259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.
Syriopoulos K; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of horizontal root fractures: an in vitro study.
Avsever H; Gunduz K; Orhan K; Uzun I; Ozmen B; Egrioglu E; Midilli M
Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):285-92. PubMed ID: 23397452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor.
Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Yüksel SP; Cebeci AR; Paksoy CS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e63-9. PubMed ID: 20416522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of Amalgam Restorations and Operation Parameters on Diagnostic Accuracy of Caries Detection Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study.
Mehanny M; AlMohareb RA; Noujeim M
Scanning; 2021; 2021():2679012. PubMed ID: 34484553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of older and newer versions of intraoral digital radiography systems: diagnosing noncavitated proximal carious lesions.
Haiter-Neto F; dos Anjos Pontual A; Frydenberg M; Wenzel A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Oct; 138(10):1353-9; quiz 1382-3. PubMed ID: 17908850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.
Bagis N; Kolsuz ME; Kursun S; Orhan K
BMC Oral Health; 2015 May; 15():64. PubMed ID: 26016804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Should cavitation in proximal surfaces be reported in cone beam computed tomography examination?
Sansare K; Singh D; Sontakke S; Karjodkar F; Saxena V; Frydenberg M; Wenzel A
Caries Res; 2014; 48(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 24481006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Accuracy of computer aided measurement for detecting dental proximal caries lesions in images of cone-beam computed tomography].
Zhang ZL; Li JP; Li G; Ma XC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 52(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 28253585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
Hintze H; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic accuracy of proximal caries by digital radiographs: an in vivo and in vitro comparative study.
Li G; Qu XM; Chen Y; Zhang J; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):463-7. PubMed ID: 20097105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the accuracy of periapical radiography with CBCT taken at 3 different voxel sizes in detecting simulated endodontic complications: an ex vivo study.
Koç C; Sönmez G; Yılmaz F; Karahan S; Kamburoğlu K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 May; 47(4):20170399. PubMed ID: 29376737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Detection of Simulated Vertical Root Fractures: Which Cone-beam Computed Tomographic System Is the Most Accurate?
Elsaltani MH; Farid MM; Eldin Ashmawy MS
J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):972-7. PubMed ID: 27130336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
