168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25059745)
21. Regulation of priority carcinogens and reproductive or developmental toxicants.
Hooper K; LaDou J; Rosenbaum JS; Book SA
Am J Ind Med; 1992; 22(6):793-808. PubMed ID: 1463026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: II. Identification of genotoxicants, reprotoxicants, and carcinogens using in silico methods.
Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Cimino MC; Benz RD; Contrera JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 16352383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Regulatory recognition of indirect genotoxicity mechanisms in the European Union.
Pratt IS; Barron T
Toxicol Lett; 2003 Apr; 140-141():53-62. PubMed ID: 12676451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hazard characterization of carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity for short chain primary nitroalkanes.
Garnick L; Gillie C; Kozal J; Monnot A; Spencer P; Quinn J; Maier A
J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Dec; 41(12):1910-1936. PubMed ID: 33847381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Classification schemes for carcinogenicity based on hazard-identification have become outmoded and serve neither science nor society.
Boobis AR; Cohen SM; Dellarco VL; Doe JE; Fenner-Crisp PA; Moretto A; Pastoor TP; Schoeny RS; Seed JG; Wolf DC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Dec; 82():158-166. PubMed ID: 27780763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A retrospective study on EU harmonised classifications for carcinogenicity to guide future research.
Terry C; Yan Z; Corvaro M; Gehen SC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Feb; 119():104800. PubMed ID: 33129916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: I. Identification of carcinogens using surrogate endpoints.
Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Cimino MC; Benz RD; Contrera JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 16386343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comprehensive model for reproductive and developmental toxicity hazard identification: I. Development of a weight of evidence QSAR database.
Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Daniel Benz R; Contrera JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Mar; 47(2):115-35. PubMed ID: 17207562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A methodology for assessing developmental and reproductive hazards of chemicals.
Brown HS; West CR; Bishop DR; Hicks LR
Toxicol Ind Health; 1986 Sep; 2(3):183-203. PubMed ID: 3787656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Classified Chemicals in Accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals: Comparison of Lists of the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and New Zealand.
Yazid MFHA; Ta GC; Mokhtar M
Saf Health Work; 2020 Jun; 11(2):152-158. PubMed ID: 32596009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hazard identification, classification, and risk assessment of carcinogens: too much or too little? - Report of an ECETOC workshop.
Felter SP; Boobis AR; Botham PA; Brousse A; Greim H; Hollnagel HM; Sauer UG
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2020 Jan; 50(1):72-95. PubMed ID: 32133908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of potential carcinogenicity of organic chemicals in synthetic turf crumb rubber.
Perkins AN; Inayat-Hussain SH; Deziel NC; Johnson CH; Ferguson SS; Garcia-Milian R; Thompson DC; Vasiliou V
Environ Res; 2019 Feb; 169():163-172. PubMed ID: 30458352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Perspectives on reproductive and developmental toxicity.
Johnson EM
Toxicol Ind Health; 1986 Dec; 2(4):453-82. PubMed ID: 3296317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. New aspects in the classification of carcinogens.
Foth H; Degen GH; Bolt HM
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2005 Jun; 56(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 15968833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Threshold-mediated mechanisms in mutagenesis: implications in the classification and regulation of chemical mutagens.
Crebelli R
Mutat Res; 2000 Jan; 464(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 10633185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Best practices for developmental toxicity assessment for classification and labeling.
Daston G; Piersma A; Attias L; Beekhuijzen M; Chen C; Foreman J; Hallmark N; Leconte I
Reprod Toxicol; 2018 Sep; 80():44-48. PubMed ID: 29753929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Identifying Toxic Consumer Products: A Novel Data Set Reveals Air Emissions of Potent Carcinogens, Reproductive Toxicants, and Developmental Toxicants.
Knox KE; Dodson RE; Rudel RA; Polsky C; Schwarzman MR
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 May; 57(19):7454-7465. PubMed ID: 37129244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Genotoxicty and mutagenicity.
Maurici D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Kleber M; Krul C; Laurent C; Loprieno N; Pasanen M; Pfuhler S; Phillips B; Sabbioni E; Sanner T; Vanparys P
Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():117-30. PubMed ID: 16194145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
