These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25060020)
1. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries. Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of image resolution on computation of fractional flow reserve: coronary computed tomography angiography versus 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography. Liu L; Yang W; Nagahara Y; Li Y; Lamooki SR; Muramatsu T; Kitslaar P; Sarai M; Ozaki Y; Barlis P; Yan F; Reiber JH; Tu S Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 26507326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. Tu S; Westra J; Yang J; von Birgelen C; Ferrara A; Pellicano M; Nef H; Tebaldi M; Murasato Y; Lansky A; Barbato E; van der Heijden LC; Reiber JHC; Holm NR; Wijns W; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 9(19):2024-2035. PubMed ID: 27712739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve. Yoon YE; Choi JH; Kim JH; Park KW; Doh JH; Kim YJ; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Gwon HC; Choe YH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1088-96. PubMed ID: 23153908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard. Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fractional flow reserve and coronary bifurcation anatomy: a novel quantitative model to assess and report the stenosis severity of bifurcation lesions. Tu S; Echavarria-Pinto M; von Birgelen C; Holm NR; Pyxaras SA; Kumsars I; Lam MK; Valkenburg I; Toth GG; Li Y; Escaned J; Wijns W; Reiber JH JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):564-74. PubMed ID: 25819180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic coronary blood flow computation: validation in quantitative flow ratio from coronary angiography. Zhang Y; Zhang S; Westra J; Ding D; Zhao Q; Yang J; Sun Z; Huang J; Pu J; Xu B; Tu S Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 35(4):587-595. PubMed ID: 30535657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography. van Rosendael AR; Koning G; Dimitriu-Leen AC; Smit JM; Montero-Cabezas JM; van der Kley F; Jukema JW; Reiber JHC; Bax JJ; Scholte AJHA Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1305-1312. PubMed ID: 28642995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses. Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of the ratio of coronary arterial lumen volume to left ventricle myocardial mass derived from coronary CT angiography on fractional flow reserve. Taylor CA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Achenbach S; Berman DS; Jensen JM; Dey D; Bøtker HE; Kim HJ; Khem S; Wilk A; Zarins CK; Bezerra H; Lesser J; Ko B; Narula J; Ahmadi A; Øvrehus KA; St Goar F; De Bruyne B; Nørgaard BL J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017 Nov; 11(6):429-436. PubMed ID: 28789941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) study. Gaur S; Achenbach S; Leipsic J; Mauri L; Bezerra HG; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(5):279-88. PubMed ID: 24268114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic cutoff for pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: A patient-level analysis. Kolli KK; van de Hoef TP; Effat MA; Banerjee RK; Peelukhana SV; Succop P; Leesar MA; Imran A; Piek JJ; Helmy TA Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 26424295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials. Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wire-free fractional flow reserve study. Kołtowski Ł; Zaleska M; Maksym J; Tomaniak M; Soliński M; Puchta D; Holm NR; Opolski G; Kochman J Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 107(9):858-867. PubMed ID: 30128817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Workstation-Based Calculation of CTA-Based FFR for Intermediate Stenosis. Kruk M; Wardziak Ł; Demkow M; Pleban W; Pręgowski J; Dzielińska Z; Witulski M; Witkowski A; Rużyłło W; Kępka C JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 9(6):690-9. PubMed ID: 26897667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of FFR-derived from CT and stress perfusion CMR with invasive FFR in intermediate-grade coronary artery stenosis. Ghekiere O; Bielen J; Leipsic J; Dewilde W; Mancini I; Hansen D; Dendale P; Nchimi A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 30284138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and non-invasive coronary flow reserve. Meimoun P; Clerc J; Ardourel D; Djou U; Martis S; Botoro T; Elmkies F; Zemir H; Luycx-Bore A; Boulanger J Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):999-1007. PubMed ID: 27752796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of machine-learning-based computed fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of myocardial ischemia verified by invasive FFR. Hu X; Yang M; Han L; Du Y Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1987-1996. PubMed ID: 30062537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Ben-Dor I; Torguson R; Deksissa T; Bui AB; Xue Z; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 22336532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]