233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25060175)
1. New possibilities for volumetric-modulated arc therapy using the Agility™ 160-leaf multileaf collimator.
Blümer N; Scherf C; Köhn J; Kara E; Loutfi-Krauß B; Imhoff D; Rödel C; Ramm U; Licher J
Strahlenther Onkol; 2014 Oct; 190(11):1066-74. PubMed ID: 25060175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of MLC properties and IMRT technique in meningioma and head-and-neck treatments.
Kantz S; Söhn M; Troeller A; Reiner M; Weingandt H; Alber M; Belka C; Ganswindt U
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Sep; 10():184. PubMed ID: 26328628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs.
Fathy MM; Hassan BZ; El-Gebaly RH; Mokhtar MH
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2023 Mar; 62(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 36576578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beam modeling and VMAT performance with the Agility 160-leaf multileaf collimator.
Bedford JL; Thomas MD; Smyth G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(2):4136. PubMed ID: 23470941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monte Carlo dose verification of VMAT treatment plans using Elekta Agility 160-leaf MLC.
Onizuka R; Araki F; Ohno T
Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():22-31. PubMed ID: 30278982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of MLC leaf width on volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Lafond C; Chajon E; Devillers A; Louvel G; Toublanc S; Olivier M; Simon A; De Crevoisier R; Manens JP
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 14(6):4074. PubMed ID: 24257269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of head and neck cancer.
Bertelsen A; Hansen CR; Johansen J; Brink C
Radiother Oncol; 2010 May; 95(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 20188427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for large volume retroperitoneal sarcomas: A comparative analysis of dosimetric and treatment delivery parameters.
Taggar AS; Graham D; Kurien E; Gräfe JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):276-281. PubMed ID: 29178585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of multileaf collimator leaf width on the radiosurgery planning for spine lesion treatment in terms of the modulated techniques and target complexity.
Chae SM; Lee GW; Son SH
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Mar; 9():72. PubMed ID: 24606890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison of different multileaf collimator leaves in treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Wang S; Ai P; Xie L; Xu Q; Bai S; Lu Y; Li P; Chen N
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 24099965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual arc volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) of nasopharyngeal carcinomas: a simultaneous integrated boost treatment plan comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapies and single arc VMAT.
Lee TF; Ting HM; Chao PJ; Fang FM
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2012 Apr; 24(3):196-207. PubMed ID: 21752615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A treatment planning study comparing Elekta VMAT and fixed field IMRT using the varian treatment planning system eclipse.
Peters S; Schiefer H; Plasswilm L
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():153. PubMed ID: 25011529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Left breast irradiation with tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) versus tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy (t-VMAT): trade-offs between secondary cancer induction risk and optimal target coverage.
Karpf D; Sakka M; Metzger M; Grabenbauer GG
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Sep; 14(1):156. PubMed ID: 31477165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric impact of multileaf collimator leaf width according to sophisticated grade of technique in the IMRT and VMAT planning for pituitary adenoma lesion.
Chae SM; Lee KW; Son SH
Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(47):78119-78126. PubMed ID: 27806336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
