These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths. Johnston TL; Karaikovic EE; Lautenschlager EP; Marcu D Spine J; 2006; 6(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17088197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pedicle screw augmentation with polyethylene tape: a biomechanical study in the osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine. Hamasaki T; Tanaka N; Kim J; Okada M; Ochi M; Hutton WC J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 20051920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model. Mehta H; Santos E; Ledonio C; Sembrano J; Ellingson A; Pare P; Murrell B; Nuckley DJ Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Mar; 27(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 22071427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of different inner core diameters on structural strength of cannulated pedicle screws under various lumbar spine movements. Chang CM; Lai YS; Cheng CK Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Aug; 16(1):105. PubMed ID: 28810871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws. Vishnubhotla S; McGarry WB; Mahar AT; Gelb DE Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):777-81. PubMed ID: 21802996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cannulated screw with solid core insert: stronger than cannulated screws. Dundon JM; Gould GC; Herbenick MA; Hamilton JA Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Sep; 43(9):E191-3. PubMed ID: 25251531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of fatigue strength of C2 pedicle screws, C2 pars screws, and a hybrid construct in C1-C2 fixation. Su BW; Shimer AL; Chinthakunta S; Salloum K; Ames CP; Vaccaro AR; Bucklen B Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(1):E12-9. PubMed ID: 24108297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical evaluation of an expansive pedicle screw in calf vertebrae. Lei W; Wu Z Eur Spine J; 2006 Mar; 15(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 15864667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lumbar pedicle screw salvage: pullout testing of three different pedicle screw designs. McLain RF; Fry MF; Moseley TA; Sharkey NA J Spinal Disord; 1995 Feb; 8(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 7711371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Triangulated pedicle screw construct technique and pull-out strength of conical and cylindrical screws. Ono A; Brown MD; Latta LL; Milne EL; Holmes DC J Spinal Disord; 2001 Aug; 14(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 11481554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contribution to FE modeling for intraoperative pedicle screw strength prediction. Van den Abbeele M; Valiadis JM; Lima LVPC; Khalifé P; Rouch P; Skalli W Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Jan; 21(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 29226718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Screw design alters the effects of stress relaxation on pullout. Inceoğlu S; Kilinçer C; McLain RF Biomed Mater Eng; 2008; 18(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 18408256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical arrangement of threaded and unthreaded portions providing holding power of transpedicular screw fixation. Tsuang FY; Chen CH; Wu LC; Kuo YJ; Lin SC; Chiang CJ Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Nov; 39():71-76. PubMed ID: 27693563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of screw position on load transfer in lumbar pedicle screws: a non-idealized finite element analysis. Newcomb AG; Baek S; Kelly BP; Crawford NR Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Feb; 20(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 27454197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]