240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25060716)
1. Is there an association between sonographically determined occipito-transverse position in the second stage of labor and operative delivery?
Phipps H; Hyett JA; Graham K; Carseldine WJ; Tooher J; de Vries B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 25060716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal head-symphysis distance and mode of delivery in the second stage of labor.
Youssef A; Maroni E; Cariello L; Bellussi F; Montaguti E; Salsi G; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Rizzo N; Pilu G; Ghi T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1011-7. PubMed ID: 25040777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia.
Lieberman E; Davidson K; Lee-Parritz A; Shearer E
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):974-82. PubMed ID: 15863533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does occiput posterior position in the second stage of labour increase the operative delivery rate?
Carseldine WJ; Phipps H; Zawada SF; Campbell NT; Ludlow JP; Krishnan SY; De Vries BS
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Jun; 53(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 23346873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.
Ghi T; Maroni E; Youssef A; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Montaguti E; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 24496823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Occipito-posterior fetal head position, maternal and neonatal outcome].
Martino V; Iliceto N; Simeoni U
Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 17923836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome.
Senécal J; Xiong X; Fraser WD;
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):763-72. PubMed ID: 15802403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transverse occiput position: Using manual Rotation to aid Normal birth and improve delivery OUTcomes (TURN-OUT): A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
de Vries B; Phipps H; Kuah S; Pardey J; Ludlow J; Bisits A; Park F; Kowalski D; Hyett JA
Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():362. PubMed ID: 26282668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes.
Cheng YW; Shaffer BL; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 16582120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section.
Reichman O; Gdansky E; Latinsky B; Labi S; Samueloff A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jan; 136(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 17368909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery.
Ghi T; Youssef A; Maroni E; Arcangeli T; De Musso F; Bellussi F; Nanni M; Giorgetta F; Morselli-Labate AM; Iammarino MT; Paccapelo A; Cariello L; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 23288706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetrical parameters influencing the duration of the second stage of labor.
Schiessl B; Janni W; Jundt K; Rammel G; Peschers U; Kainer F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jan; 118(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 15596266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.
Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?
Kalache KD; Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Cichon G; Dudenhausen JW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 19224527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nulliparous Women in the Second Stage of Labor: Changes in Delivery Outcomes Between Two Cohorts From 2000 and 2011.
Fitzwater JL; Owen J; Ankumah NA; Campbell SB; Biggio JR; Szychowski JM; Edwards RK
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 26241260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial.
Popowski T; Porcher R; Fort J; Javoise S; Rozenberg P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 46(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 25583399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study.
Bahl R; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
BMJ; 2004 Feb; 328(7435):311. PubMed ID: 14724128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of intrapartal ultrasound to assess fetal head position and station on the type of obstetrical interventions at full cervical dilatation.
Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Bamberg C; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 May; 25(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 21726168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?
Cheng YW; Hopkins LM; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):933-8. PubMed ID: 15467567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
