These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25060928)

  • 1. Preoperative assessment tool for the planning of inframammary incision and implant profile in breast augmentation.
    Atiyeh BS; Dibo SA; Nader M; Papazian NJ
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Oct; 38(5):878-86. PubMed ID: 25060928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
    Riggio E
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
    Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics.
    Tebbetts JB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Apr; 109(4):1396-409; discussion 1410-5. PubMed ID: 11964998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The pythagorean theorem as a tool for preoperative planning of a concealed scar in augmentation mammaplasty with round implants.
    Bouwer LR; Tielemans HJP; van der Lei B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jan; 135(1):110-112. PubMed ID: 25539300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Simple Method for Proper Placement of the Inframammary Fold Incision in Primary Breast Augmentation.
    Aboelatta YA; Aboelatta H; Elgazzar K
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Nov; 75(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 24691308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative Analysis of Nipple to Inframammary Fold Distance Variation in Tuberous Breast Augmentation: Is there a Progressive Lower Pole Expansion?
    Avvedimento S; Montemurro P; Cigna E; Guastafierro A; Cagli B; Santorelli A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Oct; 45(5):2017-2024. PubMed ID: 34100102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevention of implant malposition in inframammary augmentation mammaplasty.
    Kim YJ; Kim YW; Cheon YW
    Arch Plast Surg; 2014 Jul; 41(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 25075366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane.
    Góes JC; Landecker A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12925857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of breast augmentation incisions and common complications.
    Stutman RL; Codner M; Mahoney A; Amei A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(5):1096-104. PubMed ID: 22653141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetry of Inframammary Folds in Patients Undergoing Augmentation Mammaplasty.
    Yeslev M; Braun SA; Maxwell GP
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Feb; 36(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 26353799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nipple-areola complex sensitivity after primary breast augmentation: a comparison of periareolar and inframammary incision approaches.
    Mofid MM; Klatsky SA; Singh NK; Nahabedian MY
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1694-8. PubMed ID: 16651938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: Part II. Patient preparation, refined surgical techniques, and instrumentation.
    Tebbetts JB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jan; 109(1):293-305; discussion 306-7. PubMed ID: 11786828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The lateral inframammary fold incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy: outcomes from over 50 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions.
    Blechman KM; Karp NS; Levovitz C; Guth AA; Axelrod DM; Shapiro RL; Choi M
    Breast J; 2013; 19(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 23252505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical permanent expander implants: a prospective analysis of outcome and patient satisfaction.
    Gui GP; Tan SM; Faliakou EC; Choy C; A'Hern R; Ward A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jan; 111(1):125-38; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 12496573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
    Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-Dimensional Imaging and Breast Measurements: How Predictable Are We?
    Steen K; Isaac KV; Murphy BD; Beber B; Brown M
    Aesthet Surg J; 2018 May; 38(6):616-622. PubMed ID: 29272355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.
    Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Reliability of Anthropometric Measurements Used Preoperatively in Aesthetic Breast Surgery.
    Isaac KV; Murphy BD; Beber B; Brown M
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 26647138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Axillary endoscopic breast augmentation: processes derived from a 28-year experience to optimize outcomes.
    Tebbetts JB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Dec; 118(7 Suppl):53S-80S. PubMed ID: 17099484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.