131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25062655)
1. Implementation of a standardized digital rectal exam to improve the accuracy of rectocele diagnosis.
Crane AK; Geller EJ; Myers EM; Fenderson JL; Wells E; Jannelli M; Connolly A; Matthews CA
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Jan; 26(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 25062655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital rectal examination in the evaluation of rectovaginal septal defects.
Rachaneni S; Atan IK; Shek KL; Dietz HP
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1401-1405. PubMed ID: 28213798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of POP-Q posterior compartment measures with defecatory dysfunction.
Collins SA; O'Sullivan DM; Lasala CA
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jun; 23(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 22249278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Importance of Translabial Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Its Correlation with the POP-Q Examination: Analysis of 363 Cases.
Nam G; Lee SR; Kim SH; Chae HD
J Clin Med; 2021 Sep; 10(18):. PubMed ID: 34575378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between pelvic floor symptoms and POP-Q measurements.
Manonai J; Wattanayingcharoenchai R
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Aug; 35(6):724-7. PubMed ID: 25919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the presence of a true radiological rectocele increase the likelihood of symptoms of prolapse?
Dietz HP; Brown B; Friedman T; Subramaniam N
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2233-2237. PubMed ID: 33196881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Eyeball" POP-Q examination: shortcut or valid assessment tool?
Karp DR; Peterson TV; Jean-Michel M; Lefevre R; Davila GW; Aguilar VC
Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1005-9. PubMed ID: 20440479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of assessing Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification points using dynamic 2D transperineal ultrasound in women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Lone FW; Thakar R; Sultan AH; Stankiewicz A
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 22543548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional pelvic floor anatomy in Nepali women attending a general gynaecology clinic.
Turel F; Caagbay D; Dietz HP
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Oct; 29(10):1435-1440. PubMed ID: 29270722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Defecatory dysfunction and fecal incontinence in women with or without posterior vaginal wall prolapse as measured by pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q).
Augusto KL; Bezerra LRPS; Murad-Regadas SM; Vasconcelos Neto JA; Vasconcelos CTM; Karbage SAL; Bilhar APM; Regadas FSP
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jul; 214():50-55. PubMed ID: 28477524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association between ICS POP-Q coordinates and translabial ultrasound findings: implications for definition of 'normal pelvic organ support'.
Dietz HP; Kamisan Atan I; Salita A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 47(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 25854801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Utilize the simplified POP-Q system in the clinical practice of staging for pelvic organ prolapse: comparative analysis with standard POP-Q system].
Zhang H; Zhu L; Xu T; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 51(7):510-4. PubMed ID: 27465870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of transperineal ultrasound with POP-Q for assessing symptoms of prolapse.
Volløyhaug I; Rojas RG; Mørkved S; Salvesen KÅ
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):595-602. PubMed ID: 30069728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pelvic floor imaging with MR defecography: correlation with gynecologic pelvic organ prolapse quantification.
Swamy N; Bajaj G; Olliphant SS; Henry JA; Jambhekar K; Pandey T; Ram R
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32211947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: comparison of physical findings to cystodefecoperitoneography.
Altman D; López A; Kierkegaard J; Zetterström J; Falconer C; Pollack J; Mellgren A
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2005; 16(2):96-103; discussion 103. PubMed ID: 15372142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rectal-vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele.
Tan C; Tan M; Geng J; Tang J; Yang X
BMC Womens Health; 2021 Apr; 21(1):165. PubMed ID: 33879140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital assessment and quantification of pelvic organ prolapse (DPOP-Q): a randomised cross-over diagnostic agreement trial.
Thiagamoorthy G; Zacchè M; Cardozo L; Naidu M; Giarenis I; Flint R; Srikrishna S; Robinson D
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 26423265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of magnetic resonance defecography grading with POP-Q staging and Baden-Walker grading in the evaluation of female pelvic organ prolapse.
Pollock GR; Twiss CO; Chartier S; Vedantham S; Funk J; Arif Tiwari H
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1373-1380. PubMed ID: 31720767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-reduction stress urinary incontinence rates in posterior versus anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a secondary analysis.
Smith TM; DeLancey JO; Fenner DE
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1355-60. PubMed ID: 23306769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position.
Digesu GA; Athanasiou S; Cardozo L; Hill S; Khullar V
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Aug; 20(8):979-83. PubMed ID: 19387526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
