537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25063043)
1. Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis.
MacKinnon DP; Pirlott AG
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Feb; 19(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 25063043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unifying instrumental variable and inverse probability weighting approaches for inference of causal treatment effect and unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
Liu T; Hogan JW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Mar; 30(3):671-686. PubMed ID: 33213292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity plots for confounder bias in the single mediator model.
Cox MG; Kisbu-Sakarya Y; Miočević M; MacKinnon DP
Eval Rev; 2013 Oct; 37(5):405-31. PubMed ID: 24681690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classical and causal inference approaches to statistical mediation analysis.
Ato García M; Vallejo Seco G; Ato Lozano E
Psicothema; 2014 May; 26(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 24755028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder.
Vanderweele TJ; Vansteelandt S; Robins JM
Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):300-6. PubMed ID: 24487213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confounding in statistical mediation analysis: What it is and how to address it.
Valente MJ; Pelham WE; Smyth H; MacKinnon DP
J Couns Psychol; 2017 Nov; 64(6):659-671. PubMed ID: 29154577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of causal estimation of effects in mediation analyses.
Ten Have TR; Joffe MM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Feb; 21(1):77-107. PubMed ID: 21163849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Instrumental variable methods for causal inference.
Baiocchi M; Cheng J; Small DS
Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2297-340. PubMed ID: 24599889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Causal Diagrams: Pitfalls and Tips.
Suzuki E; Shinozaki T; Yamamoto E
J Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):153-162. PubMed ID: 32009103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An introduction to causal inference.
Pearl J
Int J Biostat; 2010 Feb; 6(2):Article 7. PubMed ID: 20305706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A principal stratification approach for evaluating natural direct and indirect effects in the presence of treatment-induced intermediate confounding.
Taguri M; Chiba Y
Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 25312003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distribution-free mediation analysis for nonlinear models with confounding.
Albert JM
Epidemiology; 2012 Nov; 23(6):879-88. PubMed ID: 23007042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions.
Ding P; VanderWeele TJ
Epidemiology; 2016 May; 27(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 26841057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Causal mediation analysis on failure time outcome without sequential ignorability.
Zheng C; Zhou XH
Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Oct; 23(4):533-559. PubMed ID: 27464958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation and reporting of causal mediation analysis in 2015: a systematic review in epidemiological studies.
Liu SH; Ulbricht CM; Chrysanthopoulou SA; Lapane KL
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jul; 9():354. PubMed ID: 27439301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification and robust estimation of swapped direct and indirect effects: Mediation analysis with unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding and intermediate confounding.
Tai AS; Lin SH
Stat Med; 2022 Sep; 41(21):4143-4158. PubMed ID: 35716042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Assumptions of Direction Dependence Analysis.
Thoemmes F
Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(4):516-522. PubMed ID: 31215241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing Omitted Confounder Bias in Multilevel Mediation Models.
Tofighi D; Kelley K
Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(1):86-105. PubMed ID: 26881959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.
Hogan JW; Lancaster T
Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Causal Inference in Medicine Part II. Directed acyclic graphs--a useful method for confounder selection, categorization of potential biases, and hypothesis specification].
Suzuki E; Komatsu H; Yorifuji T; Yamamoto E; Doi H; Tsuda T
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2009 Sep; 64(4):796-805. PubMed ID: 19797848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
