BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25063295)

  • 1. CRISPR-Cas: an efficient tool for genome engineering of virulent bacteriophages.
    Martel B; Moineau S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Aug; 42(14):9504-13. PubMed ID: 25063295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficient Genome Engineering of a Virulent Klebsiella Bacteriophage Using CRISPR-Cas9.
    Shen J; Zhou J; Chen GQ; Xiu ZL
    J Virol; 2018 Sep; 92(17):. PubMed ID: 29899105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An anti-CRISPR from a virulent streptococcal phage inhibits Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9.
    Hynes AP; Rousseau GM; Lemay ML; Horvath P; Romero DA; Fremaux C; Moineau S
    Nat Microbiol; 2017 Oct; 2(10):1374-1380. PubMed ID: 28785032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phage-host interactions in Streptococcus thermophilus: Genome analysis of phages isolated in Uruguay and ectopic spacer acquisition in CRISPR array.
    Achigar R; Magadán AH; Tremblay DM; Julia Pianzzola M; Moineau S
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():43438. PubMed ID: 28262818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficient engineering of a bacteriophage genome using the type I-E CRISPR-Cas system.
    Kiro R; Shitrit D; Qimron U
    RNA Biol; 2014; 11(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 24457913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional Analysis of Bacteriophage Immunity through a Type I-E CRISPR-Cas System in Vibrio cholerae and Its Application in Bacteriophage Genome Engineering.
    Box AM; McGuffie MJ; O'Hara BJ; Seed KD
    J Bacteriol; 2016 Feb; 198(3):578-90. PubMed ID: 26598368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [CRISPR/Cas systems in genome engineering of bacteriophages].
    Liang CJ; Meng FM; Ai YC
    Yi Chuan; 2018 May; 40(5):378-389. PubMed ID: 29785946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CRISPR-Cas10 assisted editing of virulent staphylococcal phages.
    Nayeemul Bari SM; Hatoum-Aslan A
    Methods Enzymol; 2019; 616():385-409. PubMed ID: 30691652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel Virulent Bacteriophage ΦSG005, Which Infects
    Fujiki J; Yoshida SI; Nakamura T; Nakamura K; Amano Y; Nishida K; Nishi K; Sasaki M; Iwasaki T; Sawa H; Komatsuzawa H; Hijioka H; Iwano H
    Viruses; 2021 Sep; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 34696394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genome Engineering of Virulent Lactococcal Phages Using CRISPR-Cas9.
    Lemay ML; Tremblay DM; Moineau S
    ACS Synth Biol; 2017 Jul; 6(7):1351-1358. PubMed ID: 28324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus.
    Deveau H; Barrangou R; Garneau JE; Labonté J; Fremaux C; Boyaval P; Romero DA; Horvath P; Moineau S
    J Bacteriol; 2008 Feb; 190(4):1390-400. PubMed ID: 18065545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Widespread anti-CRISPR proteins in virulent bacteriophages inhibit a range of Cas9 proteins.
    Hynes AP; Rousseau GM; Agudelo D; Goulet A; Amigues B; Loehr J; Romero DA; Fremaux C; Horvath P; Doyon Y; Cambillau C; Moineau S
    Nat Commun; 2018 Jul; 9(1):2919. PubMed ID: 30046034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7.
    Grigonyte AM; Harrison C; MacDonald PR; Montero-Blay A; Tridgett M; Duncan J; Sagona AP; Constantinidou C; Jaramillo A; Millard A
    Viruses; 2020 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 32050613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bacteriophage T4 Escapes CRISPR Attack by Minihomology Recombination and Repair.
    Wu X; Zhu J; Tao P; Rao VB
    mBio; 2021 Jun; 12(3):e0136121. PubMed ID: 34154416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cooperation between Different CRISPR-Cas Types Enables Adaptation in an RNA-Targeting System.
    Hoikkala V; Ravantti J; Díez-Villaseñor C; Tiirola M; Conrad RA; McBride MJ; Moineau S; Sundberg LR
    mBio; 2021 Mar; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33785624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The genetic relationship between virulent and temperate Streptococcus thermophilus bacteriophages: whole genome comparison of cos-site phages Sfi19 and Sfi21.
    Lucchini S; Desiere F; Brüssow H
    Virology; 1999 Aug; 260(2):232-43. PubMed ID: 10417258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generation of Bacteriophage-Insensitive Mutants of Streptococcus thermophilus via an Antisense RNA CRISPR-Cas Silencing Approach.
    McDonnell B; Mahony J; Hanemaaijer L; Kouwen TRHM; van Sinderen D
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Feb; 84(4):. PubMed ID: 29180373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CRISPR-Cas9 Based Bacteriophage Genome Editing.
    Zhang X; Zhang C; Liang C; Li B; Meng F; Ai Y
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Aug; 10(4):e0082022. PubMed ID: 35880867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Covalent Modifications of the Bacteriophage Genome Confer a Degree of Resistance to Bacterial CRISPR Systems.
    Liu Y; Dai L; Dong J; Chen C; Zhu J; Rao VB; Tao P
    J Virol; 2020 Nov; 94(23):. PubMed ID: 32938767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dairy phages escape CRISPR defence of Streptococcus thermophilus via the anti-CRISPR AcrIIA3.
    Pastuszka A; Rousseau GM; Somerville V; Levesque S; Fiset JP; Goulet A; Doyon Y; Moineau S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2023 Dec; 407():110414. PubMed ID: 37778080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.