173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25063409)
1. Freehand elastography for determination of breast cancer size: comparison with B-mode sonography and histopathologic measurement.
Zippel D; Shalmon A; Rundstein A; Novikov I; Yosepovich A; Zbar A; Goitein D; Sklair-Levy M
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1441-6. PubMed ID: 25063409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Tumor Sizing in Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Strain Elastography, 3-D Ultrasound and Conventional B-Mode Ultrasound with and without Compound Imaging.
Stachs A; Pandjaitan A; Martin A; Stubert J; Hartmann S; Gerber B; Glass Ä
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2758-2765. PubMed ID: 27600473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strain elastography for prediction of breast cancer tumor grades.
Grajo JR; Barr RG
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 24371107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of tumor size measurement: comparison of B-mode ultrasound, strain elastography, and 2D and 3D shear wave elastography with histopathological lesion size.
Farrokh A; Maass N; Treu L; Heilmann T; Schäfer FK
Acta Radiol; 2019 Apr; 60(4):451-458. PubMed ID: 30043622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined Use of Ultrasound Elastography and B-Mode Sonography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Circumscribed Breast Masses.
Kim SY; Park JS; Koo HR
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1951-9. PubMed ID: 26384609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of elastography in the assessment of breast lesions: preliminary results.
Navarro B; Ubeda B; Vallespí M; Wolf C; Casas L; Browne JL
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Mar; 30(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 21357553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sonographic elastography combined with conventional sonography: how much is it helpful for diagnostic performance?
Sohn YM; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Moon HJ; Kim SJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Apr; 28(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 19321669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of real-time ultrasound elastography for differential diagnosis of breast tumors.
Gong X; Wang Y; Xu P
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Dec; 32(12):2171-6. PubMed ID: 24277900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast sonographic elastography using an advanced breast tissue-specific imaging preset: initial clinical results.
Jung HJ; Hahn SY; Choi HY; Park SH; Park HK
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Feb; 31(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 22298871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of real-time tissue sono-elastography in the assessment of 214 breast lesions: limitations of this method resulting from different histologic subtypes, tumor size and tumor localization.
Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Degenhardt F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2264-71. PubMed ID: 24063962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions.
Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim H; Park YJ; Kim JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):2336-44. PubMed ID: 25130444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound Strain Elastography for Breast Lesions: Computer-Aided Evaluation With Quantifiable Elastographic Features.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Zhang X; Niu LL; Qian M; Wang CZ; Zheng HR; Zheng RQ
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 28295467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules.
Ciurea AI; Bolboaca SD; Ciortea CA; Botar-Jid C; Dudea SM
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 20938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
