101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25063555)
1. The 2 × 2 cluster randomized controlled factorial trial design is mainly used for efficiency and to explore intervention interactions: a systematic review.
Mdege ND; Brabyn S; Hewitt C; Richardson R; Torgerson DJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 67(10):1083-92. PubMed ID: 25063555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reporting of factorial trials of complex interventions in community settings: a systematic review.
Montgomery AA; Astin MP; Peters TJ
Trials; 2011 Jul; 12():179. PubMed ID: 21771302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation.
Mdege ND; Man MS; Taylor Nee Brown CA; Torgerson DJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):936-48. PubMed ID: 21411284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed variations of the stepped-wedge design can be used to accommodate multiple interventions.
Lyons VH; Li L; Hughes JP; Rowhani-Rahbar A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():160-167. PubMed ID: 28412466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rationale, Methodological Quality, and Reporting of Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trials in Critical Care Medicine: A Systematic Review.
Cook DJ; Rutherford WB; Scales DC; Adhikari NKJ; Cuthbertson BH
Crit Care Med; 2021 Jun; 49(6):977-987. PubMed ID: 33591020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis and reporting of factorial trials: a systematic review.
McAlister FA; Straus SE; Sackett DL; Altman DG
JAMA; 2003 May; 289(19):2545-53. PubMed ID: 12759326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design features.
Grayling MJ; Wason JM; Mander AP
Trials; 2017 Jan; 18(1):33. PubMed ID: 28109321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factorial designs: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trials.
Pandis N; Walsh T; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 23885023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Ndounga Diakou LA; Ntoumi F; Ravaud P; Boutron I
Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):291. PubMed ID: 28676066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design, analysis and presentation of factorial randomised controlled trials.
Montgomery AA; Peters TJ; Little P
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Nov; 3():26. PubMed ID: 14633287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survey of consent practices in cluster randomized trials: improvements are needed in ethical conduct and reporting.
Taljaard M; Chaudhry SH; Brehaut JC; Weijer C; Boruch R; Donner A; Eccles MP; McRae AD; Saginur R; Zwarenstein M; Grimshaw JM
Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 24346609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Illustrating problems faced by stroke researchers: a review of cluster-randomized controlled trials.
Sutton CJ; Watkins CL; Dey P
Int J Stroke; 2013 Oct; 8(7):566-74. PubMed ID: 23088304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficient designs: factorial randomized trials.
Whelan DB; Dainty K; Chahal J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():34-8. PubMed ID: 22810445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exergames for Patients in Acute Care Settings: Systematic Review of the Reporting of Methodological Quality, FITT Components, and Program Intervention Details.
Knols RH; Vanderhenst T; Verra ML; de Bruin ED
Games Health J; 2016 Jun; 5(3):224-35. PubMed ID: 27096922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well-being of torture survivors.
Patel N; Kellezi B; Williams AC
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; 2014(11):CD009317. PubMed ID: 25386846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of the cluster randomized crossover design in clinical trials: protocol for a systematic review.
Arnup SJ; Forbes AB; Kahan BC; Morgan KE; McDonald S; McKenzie JE
Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; 3():86. PubMed ID: 25115725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reporting of randomized factorial trials was frequently inadequate.
Kahan BC; Tsui M; Jairath V; Scott AM; Altman DG; Beller E; Elbourne D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():52-59. PubMed ID: 31585174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
