These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25064376)

  • 1. Relatively high motivation for context-evoked reward produces the magnitude effect in rats.
    Yuki S; Okanoya K
    Behav Processes; 2014 Sep; 107():22-8. PubMed ID: 25064376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for a magnitude effect in temporal discounting with pigeons.
    Grace RC; Sargisson RJ; White KG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 22229590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Amount-dependent temporal discounting?
    Ong EL; White KG
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 15157973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A concurrent-choice analysis of amount-dependent temporal discounting.
    Kinloch JM; White KG
    Behav Processes; 2013 Jul; 97():1-5. PubMed ID: 23537922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discounting of delayed food rewards in pigeons and rats: is there a magnitude effect?
    Green L; Myerson J; Holt DD; Slevin JR; Estle SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Jan; 81(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 15113132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for a magnitude effect in probability discounting with pigeons.
    Grace RC; McLean AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 26301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Theory meets pigeons: the influence of reward-magnitude on discrimination-learning.
    Rose J; Schmidt R; Grabemann M; Güntürkün O
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 198(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 19041347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Schedule-induced polydipsia in the spontaneously hypertensive rat and its relation to impulsive behaviour.
    Ibias J; Pellón R
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 223(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 21540060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
    Beeby E; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pigeons' delay discounting functions established using a concurrent-chains procedure.
    Oliveira L; Green L; Myerson J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Sep; 102(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 25044322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Delay discounting in the pigeon: In search of a magnitude effect.
    Holt DD; Wolf MR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 May; 111(3):436-448. PubMed ID: 30861141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychological distance to reward: equating the number of stimulus and response segments.
    Doughty AH; Meginley ME; Doughty SS; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2004 May; 66(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 15110910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rats engage in suboptimal choice when the delay to food is sufficiently long.
    Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(3):301-310. PubMed ID: 31070433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A possible social relative reward effect: Influences of outcome inequity between rats during operant responding.
    Douglas HM; Halverstadt BA; Reinhart-Anez P; Webber ES; Cromwell HC
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():459-469. PubMed ID: 29990520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choice with initial and terminal link reinforcement: an alternative self-control paradigm.
    Peters HL; Hunt M; Harper DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jan; 30(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 14709117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reward magnitude and timing in pigeons.
    Ludvig EA; Balci F; Spetch ML
    Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 21244854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scaling relative incentive value: different adjustments to incentive downshift in pigeons and rats.
    Pellegrini S; López Seal MF; Papini MR
    Behav Processes; 2008 Nov; 79(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 18755254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity to delay is affected by magnitude of reinforcement in rats.
    Orduña V; Valencia-Torres L; Cruz G; Bouzas A
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():18-24. PubMed ID: 23624099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
    Pitts RC; Febbo SM
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stress enhances the response to reward reduction but not food-motivated responding.
    Bowers WJ; Attiast E; Amit Z
    Physiol Behav; 1999 Nov; 67(5):777-82. PubMed ID: 10604850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.