These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25065322)

  • 1. Local tissue reaction to implantation of biodegradable suture materials.
    Kuznetsova IV; Maiborodin IV; Shevela AI; Barannik MI; Manaev AA; Brombin AI; Maiborodina VI
    Bull Exp Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 157(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 25065322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Peculiarities of tissue reactions during resorption of biodegradable suture materials].
    Kuznetsova IV; Maĭborodin IV; Shevela AI; Barannik MI; Manaev AA; Brombin AI; Maĭborodina VI
    Morfologiia; 2013; 144(4):53-9. PubMed ID: 24592702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Peculiarities of tissue reactions to implantation of non-degradable surgical materials].
    Kuznetsova IV; Maiborodin IV; Shevela AI; Barannik MI; Manayev AA; Maiborodina VI
    Morfologiia; 2014; 145(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 25051802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W; Hastings JC; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate.
    Katz AR; Mukherjee DP; Kaganov AL; Gordon S
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Sep; 161(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 3898441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of poly(glycolic acid) and catgut as suture materials. Histomorphology and mechanical properties.
    Pavan A; Bosio M; Longo T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 May; 13(3):477-96. PubMed ID: 155699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Degradation behaviors of bioabsorbable P3/4HB monofilament suture in vitro and in vivo.
    Chen X; Yang X; Pan J; Wang L; Xu K
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2010 Feb; 92(2):447-55. PubMed ID: 19927337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of microcirculatory changes in the duodenum of dogs caused by surgical suture materials.
    Petö K; Nagy A; Hauck M; Mikó I; Furka I
    Acta Chir Hung; 1997; 36(1-4):274-6. PubMed ID: 9408372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [New synthetic resorbable suture material in animal experiments and in clinical testing].
    Henke R; Kairies U
    Zentralbl Chir; 1984; 109(10):641-50. PubMed ID: 6435336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Experimental comparison of Maxon and chromic catgut in suturing of the urinary bladder].
    Osterhage HR; Grün BR; Judmann G; Wünsch HP
    Urologe A; 1988 Jan; 27(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 3284147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Biologic tissue response to sutures].
    Marianowski L; Barcz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2004 Jul; 75(7):570-7. PubMed ID: 15517778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tissue reaction to suture materials in infected surgical wounds--a histopathologic evaluation.
    Varma S; Johnson LW; Ferguson HL; Lumb WV
    Am J Vet Res; 1981 Apr; 42(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 6277211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of effects of suture materials on wound healing in a rabbit pyeloplasty model.
    Wainstein M; Anderson J; Elder JS
    Urology; 1997 Feb; 49(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 9037292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of different suture materials on cartilage reshaping.
    Cagici CA; Cakmak O; Bal N; Yavuz H; Tuncer I
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2008; 10(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 18347240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tissue response to the implantation of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoate sutures.
    Shishatskaya EI; Volova TG; Puzyr AP; Mogilnaya OA; Efremov SN
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):719-28. PubMed ID: 15346741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The peculiarities of rat tissue reactions to intraperitoneal implants made out of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates].
    Maĭborodin IV; Shevela AI; Anishchenko VV; Matveeva VA; Shevela AA; Drovosekov MN; Vlasov VV
    Morfologiia; 2011; 139(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 21866810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of suture material on the development of anastomosis reaction after gastric resection].
    Krasivskii EZ
    Klin Khir (1962); 1991; (8):16-9. PubMed ID: 1749160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.