706 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25065830)
1. Bioenergy production from diluted poultry manure and microbial consortium inside Anaerobic Sludge Bed Reactor at sub-mesophilic conditions.
Jaxybayeva A; Yangin-Gomec C; Cetecioglu Z; Ozbayram EG; Yilmaz F; Ince O
J Environ Sci Health B; 2014; 49(10):775-85. PubMed ID: 25065830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High rate manure supernatant digestion.
Bergland WH; Dinamarca C; Toradzadegan M; Nordgård AS; Bakke I; Bakke R
Water Res; 2015 Jun; 76():1-9. PubMed ID: 25776915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with food wastes via bio-methane potential assay and CSTR reactor.
Ye Y; Zamalloa C; Lin H; Yan M; Schmidt D; Hu B
J Environ Sci Health B; 2015; 50(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 25602155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mesophilic biomethanation and treatment of poultry waste-water using pilot scale UASB reactor.
Atuanya EI; Aigbirior M
Environ Monit Assess; 2002 Jul; 77(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 12180651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of pentachlorophenol and chemical oxygen demand mass concentrations in influent on operational behaviors of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor.
Shen DS; He R; Liu XW; Long Y
J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 16513261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Biogas Production Performance and Archaeal Microbial Dynamics of Corn Straw during Anaerobic Co-Digestion with Cattle Manure Liquid.
Zhang B; Zhao H; Yu H; Chen D; Li X; Wang W; Piao R; Cui Z
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):739-47. PubMed ID: 26718471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anaerobic digestion technology in poultry and livestock waste treatment--a literature review.
Sakar S; Yetilmezsoy K; Kocak E
Waste Manag Res; 2009 Feb; 27(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 19220987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two-stage thermophilic (68 degrees C/55 degrees C) anaerobic digestion with one-stage thermophilic (55 degrees C) digestion of cattle manure.
Nielsen HB; Mladenovska Z; Westermann P; Ahring BK
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 May; 86(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 15083509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste.
Prabhu MS; Mutnuri S
Waste Manag Res; 2016 Apr; 34(4):307-15. PubMed ID: 26879909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dry anaerobic ammonia-methane production from chicken manure.
Abouelenien F; Kitamura Y; Nishio N; Nakashimada Y
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Mar; 82(4):757-64. PubMed ID: 19184596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the Organic Loading Rate Increase and the Presence of Zeolite on Microbial Community Composition and Process Stability During Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Wastes.
Ziganshina EE; Belostotskiy DE; Ilinskaya ON; Boulygina EA; Grigoryeva TV; Ziganshin AM
Microb Ecol; 2015 Nov; 70(4):948-60. PubMed ID: 26045158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study of reactor performance and microbial community in psychrophilic and mesophilic biogas digesters under solid state condition.
Wei S; Guo Y
J Biosci Bioeng; 2018 May; 125(5):543-551. PubMed ID: 29305269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of inoculum acclimation on energy recovery and investigation of microbial community changes during anaerobic digestion of the chicken manure.
Yangin-Gomec C; Sapmaz T; Aydin S
Environ Technol; 2020 Jan; 41(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 30461343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microbial community dynamics and biogas production from manure fractions in sludge bed anaerobic digestion.
Nordgård AS; Bergland WH; Bakke R; Vadstein O; Østgaard K; Bakke I
J Appl Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 119(6):1573-83. PubMed ID: 26381205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of methanogenic community structure and anaerobic process performance treating swine wastewater between pilot and optimized lab scale bioreactors.
Kim W; Cho K; Lee S; Hwang S
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Oct; 145():48-56. PubMed ID: 23489568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microbial communities involved in biogas production from wheat straw as the sole substrate within a two-phase solid-state anaerobic digestion.
Heeg K; Pohl M; Sontag M; Mumme J; Klocke M; Nettmann E
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2014 Dec; 37(8):590-600. PubMed ID: 25467556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anaerobic co-digestion of biodiesel waste glycerin with municipal wastewater sludge: microbial community structure dynamics and reactor performance.
Razaviarani V; Buchanan ID
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Apr; 182():8-17. PubMed ID: 25678409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of anaerobic digestion strategies of nitrogen-rich substrates: Performance of anaerobic reactors and microbial community diversity.
Ziganshina EE; Ibragimov EM; Vankov PY; Miluykov VA; Ziganshin AM
Waste Manag; 2017 Jan; 59():160-171. PubMed ID: 27836515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microbial population dynamics in response to increasing loadings of pre-hydrolyzed pig manure in an expanded granular sludge bed.
Wang H; Tao Y; Gao D; Liu G; Chen C; Ren N; van Lier JB; de Kreuk M
Water Res; 2015 Dec; 87():29-37. PubMed ID: 26378729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
