107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25068354)
1. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction.
Loustau HD; Mayer HF
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(2):323e-324e. PubMed ID: 25068354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction.
Tessler O; Reish RG; Maman DY; Smith BL; Austen WG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):90e-99e. PubMed ID: 24469217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reconstructive breast surgery using implant and mesh].
Heidemann LN; Gunnarsson GL; Bille C; Sørensen JA; Thomsen JB
Ugeskr Laeger; 2017 Mar; 179(10):. PubMed ID: 28263160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TIGR matrix for implant-based breast reconstruction - a long-term resorbable mesh.
Cuffolo G; Holford NC; Contractor K; Tenovici A
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Sep; 15(9):689-691. PubMed ID: 30139282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Use of TIGR Matrix in Breast Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery: Is a Resorbable Synthetic Mesh a Viable Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices?
Pompei S; Evangelidou D; Arelli F; Ferrante G
Clin Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 45(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 29080661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction With Submuscular-Dermal-Mesh Pocket.
Bonomi S; Sala L; Gennaro M; Ricci C; Cortinovis U
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jan; 82(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 30247191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial Experience With Biologic Polymer Scaffold (Poly-4-hydroxybuturate) in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
Buell JF; Sigmon D; Ducoin C; Shapiro M; Teja N; Wynter E; Hanisee MK; Parker G; Kandil E; Darden M
Ann Surg; 2017 Jul; 266(1):185-188. PubMed ID: 28594679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant-based breast reconstruction with meshes and matrices: biological vs synthetic.
Jacobs JM; Salzberg CA
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2015 Apr; 76(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 25853352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subcutaneous implant breast reconstruction: Time to reconsider?
Tasoulis MK; Iqbal FM; Cawthorn S; MacNeill F; Vidya R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1636-1646. PubMed ID: 28528191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
Billon R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Meningaud JP
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reconstructive breast surgery with partially absorbable bi-component Seragyn® BR soft mesh: an outcome analysis.
Machleidt A; Schmidt-Feuerheerd N; Blohmer JU; Ohlinger R; Kueper J; von Waldenfels G; Dittmer S; Paepke S; Klein E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Oct; 298(4):755-761. PubMed ID: 30083777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing value in breast reconstruction: A systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies.
Sheckter CC; Matros E; Momeni A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Mar; 71(3):353-365. PubMed ID: 29196176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risks and benefits of using an absorbable mesh in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction: a comparative study.
Ganz OM; Tobalem M; Perneger T; Lam T; Modarressi A; Elias B; Pittet B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Mar; 135(3):498e-507e. PubMed ID: 25719714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: A pilot comparative analysis.
Garreffa E; Agrawal A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Oct; 72(10):1700-1738. PubMed ID: 31300220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
Zhang Z; Xin M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep; 148(3):489e-490e. PubMed ID: 34313647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Indications and Controversies for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Utilizing Biological Meshes.
Zenn MR
Clin Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 45(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 29080660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reply: The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
Faulkner HR; Austen WG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep; 148(3):490e. PubMed ID: 34323870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
Li H; Mu D
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Nov; 148(5):842e. PubMed ID: 34605794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reply: The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
Faulkner HR; Austen WG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Nov; 148(5):842e-843e. PubMed ID: 34605792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix.
de Blacam C; Momoh AO; Colakoglu S; Slavin SA; Tobias AM; Lee BT
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Nov; 69(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 21587037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
