These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25068556)

  • 21. Vaginal versus Robotic Hysterectomy for Commonly Cited Relative Contraindications to Vaginal Hysterectomy.
    Schmitt JJ; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Gebhart JB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 28689682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Changing hysterectomy patterns after introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Harris MB; Olive DL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 171(2):340-3; discussion 343-4. PubMed ID: 8059810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing the role of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the everyday practice of gynecology.
    Han GS
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):521-8. PubMed ID: 8829066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hysterectomy types in Estonia are still different from the Nordic countries.
    Veerus P; Lang K; Toompere K; Kirss F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 25711677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals.
    David-Montefiore E; Rouzier R; Chapron C; Daraï E;
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 16950826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital: report of 82 cases and comparison with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.
    Boike GM; Elfstrand EP; DelPriore G; Schumock D; Holley HS; Lurain JR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 168(6 Pt 1):1690-7; discussion 1697-701. PubMed ID: 8317510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. REVIEW OF ONE HUNDRED CONSECUTIVE ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMIES: SUITABILITY FOR VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY.
    Malik N
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2015; 27(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 26411131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Underutilization of vaginal hysterectomy and its impact on residency training.
    Ocheke AN; Ekwempu CC; Musa J
    West Afr J Med; 2009; 28(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 20383838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. General surgery residents' perception of robot-assisted procedures during surgical training.
    Farivar BS; Flannagan M; Leitman IM
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 25451717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
    Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
    Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Hysterectomies for benign pathology: is there a place for laparoscopic surgery?].
    Anquetil C; Capella-Alouc S; Fernandez H
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1999 Apr; 27(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 10349772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Power Morcellation Trends in a West Coast Integrated Health System.
    Zaritsky E; Tucker LY; Neugebauer R; Chou T; Flanagan T; Walter AJ; Raine-Bennett T
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 129(6):996-1005. PubMed ID: 28486359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted surgery in challenging hysterectomies - a single institutional experience.
    Perutelli A; Domenici L; Garibaldi S; Albanesi G; Baroni C; Salvati L; Salvati N; Cecchi E; Bottone P; Salerno MG
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Feb; 26(4):1235-1240. PubMed ID: 35253179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Comparative Study of Abdominal Hysterectomy versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Non Descent Cases.
    Mahmood S; Chowhdury SB; Shamim S; Ara R
    Mymensingh Med J; 2015 Jul; 24(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 26329950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Minimally invasive specialists and rates of laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Loring M; Morris SN; Isaacson KB
    JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00221. PubMed ID: 25848189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?
    Carbonnel M; Moawad GN; Tarazi MM; Revaux A; Kennel T; Favre-Inhofer A; Ayoubi JM
    JSLS; 2021; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 33879990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hysterectomy Volume Among Recent Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Graduates.
    Cadish LA; Kropat G; Muffly TM
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jun; 27(6):382-387. PubMed ID: 32371719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implementation of a Robotic Gynecologic Surgery Program in a Rural Setting: Impact on Presence of Assistant Surgeon and Route of Hysterectomy.
    Alligood-Percoco NR; Huggler AD; McQuillen AN
    JSLS; 2023; 27(3):. PubMed ID: 37746520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intramyometrial coring as an adjunct to vaginal hysterectomy.
    Kovac SR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jan; 67(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 3940327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Vaginal versus abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged non-prolapsed uterus: a retrospective cohort study.
    Fatania K; Vithayathil M; Newbold P; Yoong W
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Mar; 174():111-4. PubMed ID: 24412144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.