These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25068613)
1. The relationship between restrictive state abortion laws and postpartum depression. Medoff MH Soc Work Public Health; 2014; 29(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 25068613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How are restrictive abortion statutes associated with unintended teen birth? Coles MS; Makino KK; Stanwood NL; Dozier A; Klein JD J Adolesc Health; 2010 Aug; 47(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 20638008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laws Restricting Access to Abortion Services and Infant Mortality Risk in the United States. Pabayo R; Ehntholt A; Cook DM; Reynolds M; Muennig P; Liu SY Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(11):. PubMed ID: 32466506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The legal status of abortion in the States if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2012; 27(3):181-228. PubMed ID: 22696839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal restrictions and complications of abortion: insights from data on complication rates in the United States. Rolnick JA; Vorhies JS J Public Health Policy; 2012 Aug; 33(3):348-62. PubMed ID: 22622483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of state-level restrictions on abortion. Meier KJ; Haider-Markel DP; Stanislawski AJ; McFarlane DR Demography; 1996 Aug; 33(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 8875064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion counseling: to benefit maternal health. Steinberg TN Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):483-517. PubMed ID: 2699161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fertility-related state laws enacted in 1981. Donovan P Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 7047208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Right to abortion: the courts versus the legislatures. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1980 Jan; 54(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 6985600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trends in rates of live births and abortions following state restrictions on public funding of abortion. Korenbrot CC; Brindis C; Priddy F Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 2124355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals. Benshoof J Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on the timing of abortion. Joyce T; Kaestner R Fam Plann Perspect; 2000; 32(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 10710701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of abortion restrictions on the timing of abortions. Bitler M; Zavodny M J Health Econ; 2001 Nov; 20(6):1011-32. PubMed ID: 11758046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. States rebel against Federal abortion orders. Kent C; Tokarski C J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10132602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]