515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25068706)
1. Trend analysis from 1970 to 2008 and model evaluation of EDGARv4 global gridded anthropogenic mercury emissions.
Muntean M; Janssens-Maenhout G; Song S; Selin NE; Olivier JG; Guizzardi D; Maas R; Dentener F
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 494-495():337-50. PubMed ID: 25068706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Observed decrease in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in anthropogenic emissions.
Zhang Y; Jacob DJ; Horowitz HM; Chen L; Amos HM; Krabbenhoft DP; Slemr F; St Louis VL; Sunderland EM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(3):526-31. PubMed ID: 26729866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and application of a regional-scale atmospheric mercury model based on WRF/Chem: a Mediterranean area investigation.
Gencarelli CN; De Simone F; Hedgecock IM; Sprovieri F; Pirrone N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014 Mar; 21(6):4095-109. PubMed ID: 24170496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impacts of anthropogenic emissions and meteorology on mercury deposition over lake vs land surface in upstate New York.
Ye Z; Mao H; Driscoll CT
Ecotoxicology; 2020 Dec; 29(10):1590-1601. PubMed ID: 31586287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Updated emission inventories for speciated atmospheric mercury from anthropogenic sources in China.
Zhang L; Wang S; Wang L; Wu Y; Duan L; Wu Q; Wang F; Yang M; Yang H; Hao J; Liu X
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3185-94. PubMed ID: 25655106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Source apportionment of atmospheric mercury pollution in China using the GEOS-Chem model.
Wang L; Wang S; Zhang L; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Nielsen C; McElroy MB; Hao J
Environ Pollut; 2014 Jul; 190():166-75. PubMed ID: 24768744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use.
Obrist D; Kirk JL; Zhang L; Sunderland EM; Jiskra M; Selin NE
Ambio; 2018 Mar; 47(2):116-140. PubMed ID: 29388126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preparation of mercury emissions inventory for eastern North America.
Walcek C; De Santis S; Gentile T
Environ Pollut; 2003; 123(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 12667765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mercury flows in large-scale gold production and implications for Hg pollution control.
Wu Q; Wang S; Yang M; Su H; Li G; Tang Y; Hao J
J Environ Sci (China); 2018 Jun; 68():91-99. PubMed ID: 29908749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How well do environmental archives of atmospheric mercury deposition in the Arctic reproduce rates and trends depicted by atmospheric models and measurements?
Goodsite ME; Outridge PM; Christensen JH; Dastoor A; Muir D; Travnikov O; Wilson S
Sci Total Environ; 2013 May; 452-453():196-207. PubMed ID: 23506852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of Emission Controls to Reduce the Atmospheric Concentrations of Mercury.
Castro MS; Sherwell J
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14000-7. PubMed ID: 26606506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eddy covariance flux measurements of gaseous elemental mercury using cavity ring-down spectroscopy.
Pierce AM; Moore CW; Wohlfahrt G; Hörtnagl L; Kljun N; Obrist D
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(3):1559-68. PubMed ID: 25608027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mercury emission inventory and its spatial characteristics in the Pearl River Delta region, China.
Zheng J; Ou J; Mo Z; Yin S
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Dec; 412-413():214-22. PubMed ID: 22078372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of modeled mercury dry deposition over the Great Lakes region.
Zhang L; Blanchard P; Johnson D; Dastoor A; Ryzhkov A; Lin CJ; Vijayaraghavan K; Gay D; Holsen TM; Huang J; Graydon JA; St Louis VL; Castro MS; Miller EK; Marsik F; Lu J; Poissant L; Pilote M; Zhang KM
Environ Pollut; 2012 Feb; 161():272-83. PubMed ID: 21705119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in mercury wet deposition and mercury air concentrations across the U.S. and Canada.
Weiss-Penzias PS; Gay DA; Brigham ME; Parsons MT; Gustin MS; Ter Schure A
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Oct; 568():546-556. PubMed ID: 26803218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Global mercury emissions from combustion in light of international fuel trading.
Chen Y; Wang R; Shen H; Li W; Chen H; Huang Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y; Su S; Lin N; Liu J; Li B; Wang X; Liu W; Coveney RM; Tao S
Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(3):1727-35. PubMed ID: 24433051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Modeling Comparison of Mercury Deposition from Current Anthropogenic Mercury Emission Inventories.
Simone FD; Gencarelli CN; Hedgecock IM; Pirrone N
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 May; 50(10):5154-62. PubMed ID: 27120197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patterns and source analysis for atmospheric mercury at Auchencorth Moss, Scotland.
Kentisbeer J; Leeson SR; Malcolm HM; Leith ID; Braban CF; Cape JN
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 May; 16(5):1112-23. PubMed ID: 24690922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two decades of changing anthropogenic mercury emissions in Australia: inventory development, trends, and atmospheric implications.
MacFarlane S; Fisher JA; Horowitz HM; Shah V
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2022 Sep; 24(9):1474-1493. PubMed ID: 35603632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Atmospheric mercury and its deposition during the phasing out of an amalgam electrolysis plant: temporal, seasonal, and spatial patterns.
Navrátil T; Rohovec J; Shanley J; Matoušková Š; Nováková T; Šmejkalová AH; Prokeš R
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Dec; 30(59):123586-123602. PubMed ID: 37989951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
