BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25068855)

  • 1. Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.
    Barber SJ; Harris CB; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 25068855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recall.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2011 Jul; 19(5):462-9. PubMed ID: 21736433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.
    Meade ML; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):962-75. PubMed ID: 19744936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A meta-analytic review of collaborative inhibition and postcollaborative memory: Testing the predictions of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis.
    Marion SB; Thorley C
    Psychol Bull; 2016 Nov; 142(11):1141-1164. PubMed ID: 27618544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collaborative inhibition effect: the role of memory task and retrieval method.
    Saraiva M; Albuquerque PB; Garrido MV
    Psychol Res; 2023 Nov; 87(8):2548-2558. PubMed ID: 37027039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
    Congleton AR; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 21744986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Younger and older adults' collaborative recall of shared and unshared emotional pictures.
    Barber SJ; Castrellon JJ; Opitz P; Mather M
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):716-730. PubMed ID: 28224452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of multiple trials and computer-mediated communication on collaborative and individual semantic recall.
    Hinds JM; Payne SJ
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):415-423. PubMed ID: 28750599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collaborative encoding with a new categorization task: a contribution to collaborative memory research.
    Conte N; Pelegrina S; Padulo C; Marascia E; Fairfield B
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1339-1351. PubMed ID: 38466389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collaborative memory and part-set cueing impairments: the role of executive depletion in modulating retrieval disruption.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2011 May; 19(4):378-97. PubMed ID: 21678155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Collaborative inhibition in spatial memory retrieval.
    Sjolund LA; Erdman M; Kelly JW
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):876-85. PubMed ID: 24622929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Item Similarity and Response Competition Manipulations on Collaborative Inhibition in Group Recall.
    Zhang H; Fu Y; Zhang X; Shi J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11946. PubMed ID: 28931904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: evidence for a retrieval-based account.
    Finlay F; Hitch GJ; Meudell PR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1556-67. PubMed ID: 11185782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists.
    Hyman IE; Cardwell BA; Roy RA
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):875-90. PubMed ID: 23439153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of information distribution on collaborative inhibition.
    Meade ML; Gigone D
    Memory; 2011 Jul; 19(5):417-28. PubMed ID: 21714744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collaborative inhibition in same-age and mixed-age dyads.
    Whillock SR; Meade ML; Hutchison KA; Tsosie MD
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Nov; 35(7):963-973. PubMed ID: 32406708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study repetition and divided attention: effects of encoding manipulations on collaborative inhibition in group recall.
    Pereira-Pasarin LP; Rajaram S
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):968-76. PubMed ID: 21503804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancing individual and collaborative eyewitness memory with category clustering recall.
    Thorley C
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1128-1139. PubMed ID: 29376763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2008 Apr; 16(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 18324549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.