277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25069109)
1. A fast parallel solver for the forward problem in electrical impedance tomography.
Jehl M; Dedner A; Betcke T; Aristovich K; Klöfkorn R; Holder D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):126-37. PubMed ID: 25069109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An efficient forward solver in electrical impedance tomography by spectral element method.
Lim KH; Lee JH; Ye G; Liu QH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Aug; 25(8):1044-51. PubMed ID: 16894997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving the forward solver for the complete electrode model in EIT using algebraic multigrid.
Soleimani M; Powell CE; Polydorides N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 15889545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Front-tracking image reconstruction algorithm for EIT-monitored cryosurgery using the boundary element method.
Otten DM; Rubinsky B
Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):503-16. PubMed ID: 15886444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3-D electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains with known internal boundaries.
Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 17260850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Addressing the computational cost of large EIT solutions.
Boyle A; Borsic A; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2012 May; 33(5):787-800. PubMed ID: 22531098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using the GRID to improve the computation speed of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) reconstruction algorithms.
Fritschy J; Horesh L; Holder DS; Bayford RH
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S209-15. PubMed ID: 15798234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MEFS - MIND electrical impedance tomography forward solver.
Yang F; Zhang J; Patterson R
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3105-8. PubMed ID: 21096587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioimpedance tomography (electrical impedance tomography).
Bayford RH
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2006; 8():63-91. PubMed ID: 16834552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method for modelling and optimizing an electrical impedance tomography system.
Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S51-64. PubMed ID: 16636420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D electric impedance tomography reconstruction on multi-core computing platforms.
Borsic A; Hartov A; Paulsen KD; Manwaring P
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1175-7. PubMed ID: 19162874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Generating accurate finite element meshes for the forward model of the human head in EIT.
Tizzard A; Horesh L; Yerworth RJ; Holder DS; Bayford RH
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S251-61. PubMed ID: 15798238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconstruction of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) images based on the expectation maximum (EM) method.
Wang Q; Wang H; Cui Z; Yang C
ISA Trans; 2012 Nov; 51(6):808-20. PubMed ID: 22664353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrode boundary conditions and experimental validation for BEM-based EIT forward and inverse solutions.
Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Sep; 25(9):1180-8. PubMed ID: 16967803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography.
Tanguay LF; Gagnon H; Guardo R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 17867356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elliptic cylinder geometry for distinguishability analysis in impedance tomography.
Saka B; Yilmaz A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 51(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 14723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
