These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25069225)

  • 1. [The advantages of dynamic evaluation of measurement quality in clinical diagnostic laboratory].
    Bondarev AM; Verovskiy VT; Ostrovskiy OV; Murzina NP; Nokhashkieva IA; Trifonova IA; Fomina TA
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2014 Jan; (1):62-5. PubMed ID: 25069225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality control of laboratory results in real time.
    Picco W; Pinna Pintor L; Baruzzo G; Pistono O; Triumbari F; Pinna Pintor P
    Qual Assur Health Care; 1992 Mar; 4(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1576336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Puentmann I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Mar; 41(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 12705345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Setting performance goals and evaluating total analytical error for diagnostic assays.
    Krouwer JS
    Clin Chem; 2002 Jun; 48(6 Pt 1):919-27. PubMed ID: 12029009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluating an internal quality control procedure: application to multidimensional control].
    Marquis P; Masseyeff R
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2002; 60(5):607-16. PubMed ID: 12368148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Internal quality control system for non-stationary, non-ergodic analytical processes based upon exponentially weighted estimation of process means and process standard deviation.
    Jansen RT; Laeven M; Kardol W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2002 Jun; 40(6):616-24. PubMed ID: 12211659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated validation of clinical laboratory test results: do we get what we expect?
    De Smet D; Nanos N; Martens GA; Smet L; Damiaens S; Van Moer G; De Pauw A; Jochmans K; De Waele M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(3):379-80. PubMed ID: 19327109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring Analytical Quality: Total Analytical Error Versus Measurement Uncertainty.
    Westgard JO; Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 28153359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Setting quality specifications for the future with newer approaches to defining uncertainty in laboratory medicine.
    Dybkaer R
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):579-83. PubMed ID: 10667703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Error budgets for quality management--practical tools for planning and assuring the analytical quality of laboratory testing processes.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1996; 10(4):377-81, 384-93, 396-403. PubMed ID: 10172718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The quality of veterinary in-clinic and reference laboratory biochemical testing.
    Rishniw M; Pion PD; Maher T
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2012 Mar; 41(1):92-109. PubMed ID: 22250729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managing quality vs. measuring uncertainty in the medical laboratory.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010; 48(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 19919330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simplified approach to uncertainty of measurement in the clinical virology laboratory.
    Newman H; Tshisevhe V
    Rev Med Virol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):e2006. PubMed ID: 30112776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What information on measurement uncertainty should be communicated to clinicians, and how?
    Plebani M; Sciacovelli L; Bernardi D; Aita A; Antonelli G; Padoan A
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Jul; 57():18-22. PubMed ID: 29402416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new concept to derive permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias considering diagnostic requirements and technical state-of-the-art.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Apr; 49(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 21345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal quality control: planning and implementation strategies.
    Westgard JO
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Nov; 40(Pt 6):593-611. PubMed ID: 14629798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Domestic and international trends concerning allowable limits of error in external quality assessment scheme].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jun; 53(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 16026083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rhetoric Versus Reality? Laboratory Surveys Show Actual Practice Differs Considerably from Proposed Models and Mandated Calculations.
    Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 28153368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The coefficient of analysis, a new figure of merit for laboratory performance.
    Louderback AL; Szatkowski PR
    Clin Chem; 1980 May; 26(6):774-5. PubMed ID: 7371158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Recommendations of the American National Council for Clinical Laboratory Standardization (NCCLS)].
    Balakhovskiĭ IS
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2002 Mar; (3):53-4. PubMed ID: 11980148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.