These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25069587)

  • 21. Osteometric reassociation of commingled human remains from a modern Greek sample using bone elements of the craniovertebral junction.
    Louka V; Anastopoulou I; Moraitis K
    Anthropol Anz; 2022 Aug; 79(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 35191462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison.
    Karell MA; Langstaff HK; Halazonetis DJ; Minghetti C; Frelat M; Kranioti EF
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Sep; 130(5):1315-22. PubMed ID: 26966098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Statistical Method for Reassociating Human Tali and Calcanei from a Commingled Context.
    Anastopoulou I; Karakostis FA; Borrini M; Moraitis K
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):381-385. PubMed ID: 28568076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Osteometric sex determination of burned human skeletal remains.
    Gonçalves D; Thompson TJ; Cunha E
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Oct; 20(7):906-11. PubMed ID: 24112343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technical note: Development of regression equations to reassociate upper limb bones from commingled contexts.
    Anastopoulou I; Karakostis FA; Eliopoulos C; Moraitis K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Oct; 315():110439. PubMed ID: 32823079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Univariate and Linear Composite Asymmetry Statistics for the "Pair-Matching" of Bone Antimeres.
    Lee AB; Konigsberg LW
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1796-1801. PubMed ID: 29392726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discriminant function analysis for sex assessment in pelvic girdle bones: sample from the contemporary Mexican population.
    Gómez-Valdés JA; Torres Ramírez G; Báez Molgado S; Herrera Sain-Leu P; Castrejón Caballero JL; Sánchez-Mejorada G
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 21265837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Population variation in skeletal sexual dimorphism.
    Ubelaker DH; DeGaglia CM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():407.e1-407.e7. PubMed ID: 28698063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An Automated Two-dimensional Pairwise form Registration Method for Pair-matching of Fragmented Skeletal Remains.
    Lynch JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1790-1795. PubMed ID: 29637565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The reliability of osteometric techniques for the sex determination of burned human skeletal remains.
    Gonçalves D
    Homo; 2011 Oct; 62(5):351-8. PubMed ID: 21899836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification of sex from metacarpals: effect of side asymmetry.
    Lazenby RA
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Sep; 39(5):1188-94. PubMed ID: 7964562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital pair-matching of iliac bones: pilot study on a three-dimensional approach with models acquired through stereophotogrammetry.
    Palamenghi A; Mazzarelli D; Cappella A; De Angelis D; Sforza C; Cattaneo C; Gibelli D
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 36195690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Reliable Regression-Based Approach for Reassociating Human Skeletal Elements of the Lower Limbs from Commingled Assemblages.
    Anastopoulou I; Karakostis FA; Moraitis K
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):502-506. PubMed ID: 30102760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Postcranial sex estimation of individuals considered Hispanic.
    Tise ML; Spradley MK; Anderson BE
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1():S9-14. PubMed ID: 23127214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias.
    Nakhaeizadeh S; Dror IE; Morgan RM
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 24796950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interobserver variation of selected postcranial skeletal measurements.
    Adams BJ; Byrd JE
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Nov; 47(6):1193-202. PubMed ID: 12455639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How "standardized" is standardized? A validation of postcranial landmark locations.
    Smith AC; Boaks A
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Nov; 59(6):1457-65. PubMed ID: 25069898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Gender determination based on osteometric characteristics of the upper and lower extremities by discriminant analysis].
    Zviagin VN; Sineva IM
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(5):18-21. PubMed ID: 18050686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sexual dimorphism in the tarsal bones: implications for sex determination.
    Harris SM; Case DT
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 22211822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A method for estimating sex using the clavicle, humerus, radius, and ulna.
    Albanese J
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1413-9. PubMed ID: 23865634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.