These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25069752)

  • 1. Effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on peripheral MDCT angiography virtual histology plaque volumes: have we been overestimating disease burden?
    Patil VV; Tanenbaum LN; Lookstein RA
    Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(6):821-5. PubMed ID: 25069752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in quantifying coronary calcium.
    Takahashi M; Kimura F; Umezawa T; Watanabe Y; Ogawa H
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 26276567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Son SS; Choo KS; Jeon UB; Jeon GR; Nam KJ; Kim TU; Yeom JA; Hwang JY; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 25414055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Lin XZ; Machida H; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Ueno E; Chen KM; Yan FH
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 24496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
    Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Iterative image reconstruction algorithms in coronary CT angiography improve the detection of lipid-core plaque--a comparison with histology.
    Puchner SB; Ferencik M; Maurovich-Horvat P; Nakano M; Otsuka F; Kauczor HU; Virmani R; Hoffmann U; Schlett CL
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 25182630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region.
    Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Matsuda I; Ishida M; Yasaka K; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 23199752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction on coronary plaque analysis in coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Precht H; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Dijkstra J; Gerke O; Thygesen J; Egstrup K; Lambrechtsen J
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(6):507-516. PubMed ID: 27769663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iterative Image Reconstruction Improves the Accuracy of Automated Plaque Burden Assessment in Coronary CT Angiography: A Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound.
    Puchner SB; Ferencik M; Maehara A; Stolzmann P; Ma S; Do S; Kauczor HU; Mintz GS; Hoffmann U; Schlett CL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):777-784. PubMed ID: 28177655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro.
    Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Ueno E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 23436858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
    Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of iterative model reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification.
    Szilveszter B; Elzomor H; Károlyi M; Kolossváry M; Raaijmakers R; Benke K; Celeng C; Bartykowszki A; Bagyura Z; Lux Á; Merkely B; Maurovich-Horvat P
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 32(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 26285899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
    Padole A; Singh S; Ackman JB; Wu C; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Otrakji A; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of iterative image reconstruction algorithms on the feasibility of automated plaque assessment in coronary CT angiography.
    Puchner SB; Ferencik M; Karolyi M; Do S; Maurovich-Horvat P; Kauczor HU; Hoffmann U; Schlett CL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 29(8):1879-88. PubMed ID: 23990390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative analysis of emphysema and airway measurements according to iterative reconstruction algorithms: comparison of filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction.
    Choo JY; Goo JM; Lee CH; Park CM; Park SJ; Shim MS
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Apr; 24(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 24275806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of linear measurements of the jaws using ultralow-dose MDCT and the iterative techniques of ASIR and MBIR.
    Al-Ekrish AA; Al-Shawaf R; Schullian P; Al-Sadhan R; Hörmann R; Widmann G
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1791-801. PubMed ID: 27255542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.