These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25069898)
1. How "standardized" is standardized? A validation of postcranial landmark locations. Smith AC; Boaks A J Forensic Sci; 2014 Nov; 59(6):1457-65. PubMed ID: 25069898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consistency of selected craniometric landmark locations and the resulting variation in measurements. Smith AC; Boaks A Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Nov; 280():156-163. PubMed ID: 29055251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metric sex estimation from the postcranial skeleton for the Colombian population. Moore MK; DiGangi EA; Niño Ruíz FP; Hidalgo Davila OJ; Sanabria Medina C Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():286.e1-8. PubMed ID: 27032896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of Three Commonly Used Tibia Length Measurement Techniques. Lynch JJ; Maijanen H; Prescher A J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):181-185. PubMed ID: 30001468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tables for the metric evaluation of pair-matching of human skeletal elements. Thomas RM; Ubelaker DH; Byrd JE J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):952-6. PubMed ID: 23682771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new method for discriminating African-American from European-American skeletons using postcranial osteometrics reflective of body shape. Holliday TW; Falsetti AB J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):926-30. PubMed ID: 10486943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Preliminary Investigation into the Accuracy of 3D Modeling and 3D Printing in Forensic Anthropology Evidence Reconstruction. Carew RM; Morgan RM; Rando C J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):342-352. PubMed ID: 30296344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Analysis on the Choice of Alpha Level in the Osteometric Pair-matching of the Os Coxa, Scapula, and Clavicle. Lynch JJ J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):793-797. PubMed ID: 28718882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standardization and quality assurance in skeletal landmark placement and osteometry. Liebenberg L; Krüger GC Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Mar; 308():110168. PubMed ID: 32006879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Power of Exclusion using Automated Osteometric Sorting: Pair-Matching. Lynch JJ; Byrd J; LeGarde CB J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):371-380. PubMed ID: 28547802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Osteometric sorting of skeletal elements from a sample of modern Colombians: a pilot study. Rodríguez JM; Hackman L; Martínez W; Medina CS Int J Legal Med; 2016 Mar; 130(2):541-50. PubMed ID: 25588668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postcranial sex estimation of individuals considered Hispanic. Tise ML; Spradley MK; Anderson BE J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1():S9-14. PubMed ID: 23127214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anthropological measurement of the juvenile clavicle using multi-detector computed tomography--affirming reliability. Brough AL; Bennett J; Morgan B; Black S; Rutty GN J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):946-51. PubMed ID: 23682704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proposed method for predicting pair matching of skeletal elements allows too many false rejections. Vickers S; Lubinski PM; Henebry DeLeon L; Bowen JT J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 25069587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]