909 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25069937)
21. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microscopic computerized tomographic evaluation of root canal transportation prepared with twisted or ground nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
Freire LG; Gavini G; Branco-Barletta F; Sanches-Cunha R; dos Santos M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):e143-8. PubMed ID: 21937249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path.
Elnaghy AM; Elsaka SE
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2053-6. PubMed ID: 25301350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro-computed tomography.
Yamamura B; Cox TC; Heddaya B; Flake NM; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22794219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT Compared with Reciproc in Removing Obturation Material from Severely Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.
Nevares G; de Albuquerque DS; Freire LG; Romeiro K; Fogel HM; Dos Santos M; Cunha RS
J Endod; 2016 May; 42(5):803-8. PubMed ID: 27117757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Single-file Systems.
Hasheminia SM; Farhad A; Sheikhi M; Soltani P; Hendi SS; Ahmadi M
J Endod; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1788-1791. PubMed ID: 30390970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of 2 Nickel-Titanium Instrument Systems in Shaping Root Canals.
da Silva Limoeiro AG; Dos Santos AH; De Martin AS; Kato AS; Fontana CE; Gavini G; Freire LG; da Silveira Bueno CE
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):496-9. PubMed ID: 26776939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness of TRUShape and ProTaper Next systems in curved root canals using micro-computed tomography.
Elnaghy AM; Al-Dharrab AA; Abbas HM; Elsaka SE
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27669727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Shaping ability of different nickel-titanium systems in simulated S-shaped canals with and without glide path.
Bürklein S; Poschmann T; Schäfer E
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1231-4. PubMed ID: 25069939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular molars with the self-adjusting file.
Paqué F; Peters OA
J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 21419301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Root Canal Shaping Using Nickel Titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: A Micro-computed Tomographic Comparative Study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold Instruments in Maxillary First Molars.
van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F; Vorster M; de Wet FA
J Endod; 2019 Jan; 45(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 30446405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of three nickel-titanium rotary systems in the middle mesial canal of mandibular first molars: an ex vivo study based on 3D printed tooth replicas.
Zhu Q; Liu C; Bai B; Pei F; Tang Y; Song W; Chen X; Gu Y
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):294. PubMed ID: 38431556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation.
Gekelman D; Ramamurthy R; Mirfarsi S; Paqué F; Peters OA
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19840653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
Pedullà E; Grande NM; Plotino G; Gambarini G; Rapisarda E
J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):258-61. PubMed ID: 23321241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments in artificial canals.
Higuera O; Plotino G; Tocci L; Carrillo G; Gambarini G; Jaramillo DE
J Endod; 2015 Jun; 41(6):913-5. PubMed ID: 25771139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
